Abstract

The mouse is an established and popular animal model for studying reproductive biology. Epididymal mouse sperm, which lack exposure to secretions of male accessory glands and do not precisely represent ejaculated sperm for the study of sperm functions, have been almost exclusively used in studies. We compared ejaculated and epididymal sperm in an in vitro fertilization setting to examine whether ejaculated sperm enter cumulus-oocyte complexes more efficiently. In order to prepare sperm for fertilization, they were incubated under capacitating conditions. At the outset of incubation, ejaculated sperm stuck to the glass surfaces of slides and the incidences of sticking decreased with time; whereas, very few epididymal sperm stuck to glass at any time point, indicating differences in surface charge. At the end of the capacitating incubation, when sperm were added to cumulus-oocyte complexes, the form of flagellar movement differed dramatically; specifically, ejaculated sperm predominantly exhibited increased bending on one side of the flagellum (a process termed pro-hook hyperactivation), while epididymal sperm equally exhibited increased bending on one or the other side of the flagellum (pro-hook or anti-hook hyperactivation). This indicates that accessory sex gland secretions might have modified Ca2+ signaling activities in sperm, because the two forms of hyperactivation are reported to be triggered by different Ca2+ signaling patterns. Lastly, over time, more ejaculated than epididymal sperm entered the cumulus oocyte complexes. We concluded that modification of sperm by male accessory gland secretions affects the behavior of ejaculated sperm, possibly providing them with an advantage over epididymal sperm for reaching the eggs in vivo.

Highlights

  • The mouse is an established and popular animal model for studying mechanisms that regulate sperm movement and fertilization in mammals

  • We tested the hypothesis that ejaculated and epididymal mouse sperm move differently. This hypothesis was based on the possibility that the presence of the cytoplasmic droplet on the flagellum of epididymal sperm and the modification of the plasma membranes of ejaculated sperm by accessory gland secretions could affect movement speeds or patterns

  • Our observations show that ejaculated sperm swim differently than epididymal sperm and are more efficient at penetrating the cumulus oophorous

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The mouse is an established and popular animal model for studying mechanisms that regulate sperm movement and fertilization in mammals. It has been reported that seminal vesicle secretion 2 (SVS2) binds to ganglioside GM1 in the postacrosomal region of mouse sperm to inhibit epididymal sperm capacitation in vitro [5, 6]. Serine protease inhibitor kazal-type-like protein (SPINKL) from mouse seminal vesicles is found to delay the capacitation of epididymal mouse sperm in vitro [7]. In view of these and other effects of accessory gland secretions, one could conclude that using epididymal mouse sperm to study sperm function does not precisely represent how sperm function in vivo. This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that ejaculated and epididymal sperm behave differently

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.