Abstract

Although many patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) may need extended treatment, efficacy and safety issues of full- or lower-intensity anticoagulation over acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) treatment have remained to be determined. EINSTEIN CHOICE is a randomized, double-blind and phase 3 study, and compared either once-daily rivaroxaban (at doses of 20 mg or 10 mg) and 100 mg of ASA in patients with VTE who were in equipoise regarding the need for extended anticoagulation. Study drugs were administered for up to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic recurrent fatal or nonfatal VTE and the principal safety outcome was major bleeding. A total of 3365 patients were included in the intentionto-treat analyses (median treatment duration, 351 days). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 1.5% of patients receiving 20 mg of rivaroxaban and in 1.2% of patients receiving 10 mg of rivaroxaban, in comparison to 4.4% of those receiving aspirin (hazard ratio for 20 mg of rivaroxaban vs. ASA, 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20 to 0.59; hazard ratio for 10 mg of rivaroxaban vs. ASA, 0.26; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.47; P<0.001 for both comparisons). Rates of major bleeding and adverse events were comparable among three treatment groups. In conclusion, in patients with VTE in equipoise for extended anticoagulation, either a treatment dose (20 mg) or a prophylactic dose (10 mg) of rivaroxaban compared with ASA significantly reduced the risk of VTE recurrence without a significant increase in bleeding risk.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.