Abstract

Space flights are in these days not any more question of technology, but more question of costs. One way how to decrease cost of launch is change of home spaceport. Change of home spaceport for different rockets is a way to achieve more efficient launches to space. The reason is different acceleration achieved from Earth rotation. We added several mathematical calculations of missions to Low Earth Orbit and Geostationary Earth Orbit to show bonuses from Earth rotation and effect of atmospheric drag on specific rockets used these days. We discussed only already used space vessels. Namely Arianne 5, Delta 4 heavy, Proton-M, Zenit and Falcon9. For reaching GEO we discuss possibility of using Hohmman transfer, because none of aforementioned vessels is available for direct GEO entry. As possible place for launch we discussed spaceports Baikonur, Kennedy Space center, Guyana Space center and Sea Launch platform. We present results in form of additional acceleration for each spaceport, and we also project this additional acceleration in means payload increase. In conclusion we find important differences between vessel effectivity based on spaceport used for launch. Change of launch location may bring significant cost decrease for operators.

Highlights

  • Missions to Earth orbits and especially to Geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) are made from few locations on Earth

  • Space missions to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) from four different spaceports placed on different latitudes are representing all possible economic outputs

  • For the following calculations with Kennedy space center only more efficient Hohmann transfer will be used except for Falcon 9 launch. Even though it is not absolutely precise, because there are still forces acting against rocket which are not included in this work, spaceports impact on rocket mission efficiency can be determined

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Missions to Earth orbits and especially to GEO are made from few locations on Earth. These spaceports are normally bound to the national programs or agencies and only part of its launches are made for commercial purposes. Space missions to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) from four different spaceports placed on different latitudes are representing all possible economic outputs. Because of increased use of orbits and deep space the economic point of view due to huge cost of rocket launch is coming more to the light of the day. Better spaceport efficiency is based additional speed added from rotation of Earth. This additional velocity raises from poles to equator. This effect only occurs for launches for GEO of LEO without inclination, and only launches made eastbound

Current spaceports
Rocket performance
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.