Efficacy of Follow-up Care System of Living Kidney Donors in Monitoring of Residual Kidney Function

Abstract

BackgroundThe possibility of an increased risk of end-stage renal disease is a major concern associated with living kidney donation. Therefore, monitoring of residual kidney function becomes most essential. MethodsA data analysis of 156 living kidney donors (LKDs) was conducted. The efficacy of the long-term care system with regard to monitoring residual kidney function was evaluated. ResultsThe analyzed group consisted of 102 (65.4%) women. The mean follow-up period was 5.44 years. The rise in value of mean serum creatinine concentration after donation was observed, but it was within the range of normal during the observation period. Despite its initial decline after nephrectomy, mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remained >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. A MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) GFR in the range of 45–60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was observed in 53 donors (33.97%). It was found to be <45.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 in 15 cases (9.6%). No patient developed end-stage renal disease. Only 25.0% of those analyzed had their CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) GFR estimated on 45–60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 4.49% were found to have levels of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (down to 33.7 mL/min/1.73 m2). Mean postdonation CKD-EPI GFR was estimated at 69.99% of its predonation value. ConclusionA reliable qualification process could minimize the probability of kidney donation by someone with an increased risk of chronic kidney failure. The CKD-EPI formula seems to be more precise than the MDRD for estimatation of LKDs' GFR, as their loss of GFR is a result of nephrectomy and not kidney or systemic disease. Using the MDRD formula may lead to inappropriate diagnosis of CKD in some cases.