Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the potential use of mirtazapine in Korean veterans diagnosed with PTSD, by comparing it with sertraline, a drug approved for use in PTSD in the USA. Efficacy was evaluated by the clinician administered PTSD scale (CAPS-2), the Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD-17) and the clinical global impression scale (CGI), at baseline and at weeks 1, 2 and 6. A response was defined as a > or = 30 % decrease in CAPS-2 total severity, a > or = 50 % decrease in total HAMD-17 score, and a CGI-I score < 3. 51 patients on mirtazapine (mean age/duration of illness: 59.1/33.5 years) and 49 on sertraline (mean age/duration of illness: 60.6/35.6 years) completed the study. The mean daily dosage was 34.1 mg for mirtazapine and 101.5 mg for sertraline. On the CAPS-2 total score more patients responded in the mirtazapine group at week 1 (13 vs 2 %) and week 2 (51 vs 31 %). At week 6 this difference was statistically significant (88 % vs 69 %, p = 0.039) on the CAPS-2 total score. The HAMD-17 total score and CGI-I score decreased in both groups, with no significant differences between th groups on all time points. The main side effects for the mirtazapine group were: dry mouth (19.6 %), constipation (19.6 %), somnolence (15.7 %) and weight gain (1.96 %); and for the sertraline group: indigestion (14.3 %), palpitation (6.1 %), agitation (2.0 %), epigastric soreness (2.0 %), insomnia (2.0 %) and sexual dysfunction (2.0 %). Mirtazapine appeared to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for PTSD in Korean veterans.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
