Efficacy and safety of sunitinib and everolimus as front-line treatment for nonclear cell RCC: A pooled-analysis from randomized trials.

Abstract

e16069 Background: Non-clear Renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) accounts for about 25% of all RCC and generally is responsible for a poorer outcome in metastatic setting. Optimal treatment for patients with metastatic non-ccRCC has not been established yet; therefore Sunitinib and Everolimus still represent two feasible options as frontline therapy, given the results reported from single-arm trials and expanded access studies. Hence, we provided a pooled analysis from prospective randomized trials to evaluate the benefit and risks of these therapies for patients with metastatic-non-ccRCC. Methods: A systematic search of literature was carried out using Medline, Embase, ESMO and ASCO library with no data restriction up to December 2016, to identify relevant studies on this topic. Eligible studies had to fulfill the following criteria: randomized prospective trial comparing the efficacy of Sunitninb and Everolimus as first line therapy in patients with m-non-ccRCC. Studies excluded: non-randomized prospective trials, subgroup analysis data deriving from randomized prospective trials carried out on metastatic ccRCC population. No language restriction was applied. Data were pooled using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: The literature search identified 29 potential titles and abstracts of whom only 2, recruiting a total of 176 metastatic-non ccRCC patients (Sunitinib: 84, Everolimus: 92), fulfilled our eligible criteria and were included in the pooled analysis. A trend towards better outcome in terms of PFS and OS was reported among patients with non-cc RCC enrolled in Sunitinib arm. Sunitinib vs Everolimus: PFS [HR]:0,83 [0,38-1,78]; OS [HR]: 0,67 [0,37-1,21]. Moreover Sunitinib was associated with more Grade 3-4 adverse events HR: 3.06 [1,60-5,84]. Conclusions: This pooled analysis reported a trend towards favoring Sunitinib versus Everolimus for the first line treatment of patients with metastatic non-ccRCC, although statistical significance was not reached. Sutent was associated with more Grade 3-4 toxicieties. Further prospective randomized phase III trials are required to clarify the better therapeutic option for this subset of patients.