Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Genital or Scalp Psoriasis in the UnlIMMited Phase4 Randomized Clinical Trial at Week16.

Patients with psoriasis and low body surface area (BSA) involvement often experience substantially reduced quality of life and may be candidates for topical therapies. Fixed-combination halobetasol propionate (0.01%) and tazarotene (0.045%) lotion (HP/TAZ) vs vehicle lotion was evaluated in participants with 3% to 5% BSA involvement. In two phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 8-week studies (ClinicalTrial.gov identifiers: NCT02462070/NCT02462122), adults with moderate/severe investigator’s global assessment (IGA) score were randomized 2:1 to once-daily HP/TAZ or vehicle. Pooled post hoc analyses included participants with baseline BSA involvement of 3% to 5%. Measures included treatment success (≥2-grade IGA reduction, clear/almost clear score), reduction in affected BSA, and clinically meaningful improvement (reduction) of ≥4 points on dermatology life quality index (DLQI). Of 418 participants, 232 had baseline BSA involvement of 3% to 5% (HP/TAZ, n=149; vehicle, n=83). At week 8, 42.7% of HP/TAZ-treated participants achieved treatment success, compared with 11.4% of vehicle-treated participants (P< .001). Participants experienced significantly greater reductions in affected BSA at week 8 with HP/TAZ (-36.0%) vs vehicle (-1.6%; P< .001). Larger proportions experienced clinically meaningful DLQI improvements at week 8 with HP/TAZ (64.2%) vs vehicle (47.4%; P< .05). More participants achieved a ≥2-grade improvement in plaque elevation and scaling with HP/TAZ vs vehicle (each comparison, P< .001). Serious adverse events and discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events were rare. In participants with plaque psoriasis and BSA involvement of 3% to 5%, HP/TAZ provided significantly improved effectiveness after 8 treatment weeks vs vehicle lotion, with clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(8):829-836. doi:10.36849/JDD.6217.

Apremilast for immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced psoriasis: A case series

SummaryBackgroundPatients with plaque psoriasis treated with biologic therapies need more efficacious, safe and convenient treatments to improve quality of life. Risankizumab and secukinumab inhibit interleukin‐23 and interleukin‐17A, respectively, and are effective in adult patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis but have different dosing regimens.ObjectivesTo compare directly the efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs. secukinumab over 52 weeks.MethodsIMMerge was an international, phase III, multicentre, open‐label, efficacy–assessor‐blinded, active‐comparator study, in which adult patients with chronic, moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to treatment with risankizumab 150 mg or secukinumab 300 mg. Primary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of patients achieving ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) at week 16 (noninferiority comparison with margin of 12%) and week 52 (superiority comparison).ResultsIn total 327 patients from nine countries were treated with risankizumab (n = 164) or secukinumab (n = 163). Risankizumab was noninferior to secukinumab in the proportion of patients achieving PASI 90 at week 16 [73·8% vs. 65·6%; difference of 8·2%, 96·25% confidence interval (CI)−2·2 to 18·6; within the 12% noninferiority margin] and superior to secukinumab at week 52 (86·6% vs. 57·1%; difference of 29·8%, 95% CI 20·8–38·8; P < 0·001), thus meeting both primary endpoints. All secondary endpoints (PASI 100, static Physician's Global Assessment 0 or 1, and PASI 75) at week 52 demonstrated superiority for risankizumab vs. secukinumab (P < 0·001). No new safety concerns were identified.ConclusionsAt week 52, risankizumab demonstrated superior efficacy and similar safety with less frequent dosing compared with secukinumab.

Risankizumab has demonstrated efficacy in phase III trials in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. The exposure–response relationships for risankizumab efficacy (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)75, PASI90, PASI100, and static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA)0/1) at week 16 (N = 1,732) and week 52 (N = 598) as well as safety (incidence of any adverse event, serious adverse event, infection and infestation, or serious infection) over up to 52 weeks were characterized using the data from risankizumab phase II and III clinical trials in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. Impact of clinically relevant covariates was evaluated. Risankizumab phase III regimen (150 mg subcutaneously at weeks 0, 4, and every 12 weeks thereafter) achieved the plateau of the exposure–efficacy relationships with model‐estimated PASI90 and sPGA0/1 response probabilities of 77%, and 87%, respectively, at week 16 and 85%, and 88%, respectively, at week 52. There was no apparent relationship between risankizumab plasma exposure and the evaluated safety variables.

Guselkumab and risankizumab for psoriasis: a 44-week indirect real-life comparison

IntroductionDeucravacitinib is an oral, selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor that demonstrated therapeutic benefit in a Phase 2 clinical trial of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This analysis was designed to evaluate the effect of deucravacitinib on additional clinical and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes and assess the relationship between these outcomes in adults with psoriasis.MethodsPost-hoc analysis of a 12-week Phase 2 trial was conducted for the three most efficacious dosage groups (3 mg twice daily, 6 mg twice daily, 12 mg once daily) and placebo. Investigator assessments for efficacy included Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA) involvement, and static Physician's Global Assessment; QoL was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Treatment responses and their associations were evaluated over time.ResultsDeucravacitinib elicited improvement versus placebo as early as Week 4 for most efficacy measures (including changes in absolute PASI and BSA), with efficacy trends observed from Week 2 to Week 12. Improvements in QoL, assessed by achievement of a DLQI overall score of 0/1 (no effect at all on patient’s life), followed a pattern similar to deucravacitinib-related clinical outcomes over 12 weeks. Overall, patients with greater improvements in psoriasis-related clinical signs and symptoms also reported greater improvement in QoL. However, complete skin clearance was not required for achieving DLQI 0/1.ConclusionDeucravacitinib treatment produced early response and similar trends in improvements across multiple efficacy assessments and QoL in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Deucravacitinib has the potential to become a promising new oral therapy for this condition.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NCT02931838.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00649-y.

Systems for determining psoriasis severity in clinical trials have not been sufficiently validated against patients' perceived quality of life. To validate three systems of physician-determined psoriasis severity (the Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment [LS-PGA], Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] and static Physician's Global Assessment [sPGA]). Data were from a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of therapy with oral calcineurin inhibitors in 445 patients. Construct validity was measured by correlations of the three severity scores with patients' self-reported quality of life (QoL) from the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and a DLQI item about psoriasis symptoms. All severity systems were moderately and positively correlated with QoL, indicating construct validity. QoL was most consistently related to physicians' assessments of body surface area involved with psoriasis (iBSA) followed by, in the order of consistency, plaque elevation, erythema and scale. The LS-PGA weights iBSA and aspects of plaque morphology in concert with their relative effects on QoL. The LS-PGA, sPGA and PASI are validated by their relationship to QoL in a clinical trial.

Risankizumab has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to other psoriasis treatments, including secukinumab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab; switching to risankizumab from other psoriasis treatments has shown superior clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of directly switching patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and a suboptimal response to interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (secukinumab or ixekizumab) to risankizumab. This 52-week, phase 3b study enrolled patients (≥ 18years) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had previously been treated with the recommended dose of secukinumab or ixekizumab for ≥ 6months but did not achieve an optimal response (static Physician's Global Assessment [sPGA] 2/3; body surface are [BSA] 3- < 10%). Patients received subcutaneous risankizumab (150mg) without washout. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving sPGA of 0/1 at week 16. Secondary endpoints included sPGA 0/1 at week 52, sPGA 0, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1, and Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) 0 at weeks 16 and 52. Safety was monitored throughout the study. The study included 244 patients. sPGA 0/1 was achieved by 57.4% and 62.3% at week 16 and 52. At week 16, sPGA 0, DLQI 0/1, and PSS 0 were achieved by 20.5%, 40.2%, and 20.9%, respectively. At week 52, these proportions increased to 27.1% for sPGA 0, 47.2% for DLQI 0/1, and 27.5% for PSS 0. Most frequently reported adverse events (reported in ≥ 5% of patients) in risankizumab-treated patients were COVID-19 infection (8.6%) and nasopharyngitis (5.7%). No new safety signals were observed. Directly switching to risankizumab improved outcomes and QoL in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had suboptimal responses to anti-IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab or ixekizumab). The safety results are consistent with previously reported safety of risankizumab. This study supports the efficacy of risankizumab in patients previously treated with biologics, including IL-17 inhibitors, and suggests a direct switch to risankizumab for improved clinical outcomes and QoL. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04102007.

SummaryA lack of national guidelines in some countries and lack ofconsensus amongst those that do exist in others is problematic.Specifically, poor and inconsistent advice on initiating and opti-mising therapeutic interventions is a barrier to improving out-comes. While European guidelines can help to fill the gap incountries without national guidelines, their role should primar-ily be to strengthen and harmonise existing guidelines, and toprovide a framework for the development of new nationalguidelines. They therefore need to lead the provision of advicethat is not given in existing guidelines. Limited awareness ofguidelines and increasing pressures on patient consultation can Figure 5 The concept of cumulative life course impairment(CLCI) in psoriasis. 22 CLCI results from an interaction betweenthe burden of stigmatisation, physical and psychological co-mor-bidities; and coping strategies and external factors. Significantimpairment may occur in patients with ineffective coping strate-gies and limited social support, even if they have a small burden.This impairment may be less in patients with effective copingstrategies and strong social support networks, even if the bur-den is large. (Figure adapted from Kimball 2010.)

Accurate and reliable assessment of changes in psoriasis severity is critical in clinical trials of therapies. To compare Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA), and the Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS-PGA) in a trial of systemic treatments for plaque psoriasis vulgaris and to assess whether they measure change in psoriasis induced by therapy. Patients were randomized to voclosporin or cyclosporine for 24weeks (the '24-week-treatment' group, n=366), or placebo for 12weeks followed by voclosporin for 12weeks (the 'initial-placebo' group, n=89). All scoring systems changed in concert and were sensitive enough to detect reductions in severity during placebo therapy as well as with active therapy (P<0.01 for each measurement). At study onset, there were poorer correlations of sPGA with PASI (r=0.45) and LS-PGA (r=0.39) than between PASI and LS-PGA (r=0.68). After therapy, all correlations were stronger, but sPGA continued to be less well correlated (with PASI, r=0.85; with LS-PGA, r=0.79) than LS-PGA with PASI (r=0.90). Two- or three-step improvements in LS-PGA showed very good to excellent accuracy in corresponding to PASI-50 and PASI-75, respectively, and were more accurate than comparable changes in sPGA. PASI, sPGA and LS-PGA are responsive to the varying degrees of improvement in psoriasis induced by either placebo or active therapy. While the three systems capture similar information, each has different reasons for use in a clinical trial.

Risankizumab compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMvent): a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled phase 3 trial

Updates in psoriasis diagnosis and treatment status in China: results from the National Psoriasis Center Registry.

Genital psoriasis (GenPs) is a common, debilitating and difficult-to-treat manifestation of plaque psoriasis. However, few controlled, interventional studies of GenPs exist. To determine the efficacy of ixekizumab vs. placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe GenPs with ≥ 1% involved body surface area (BSA). Patients with moderate-to-severe GenPs, defined as a baseline static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) score of ≥ 3, with BSA ≥ 1% were randomized 1 : 1 to receive placebo (n = 74) or the recommended dosing of ixekizumab (n = 75). Major outcomes included the percentage of patients achieving 0 or 1 scores on the sPGA-G (primary end point), overall sPGA, GenPs Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) item 2, and ≥ 3-point improvement from baseline on the GenPs itch numerical rating scale. At week 12, ixekizumab was superior to placebo for sPGA-G 0/1 (73% vs. 8%, P < 0·001), overall sPGA 0/1 (73% vs. 3%, P < 0·001), GenPs-SFQ item 2 score of 0 or 1 (78% vs. 21%, P < 0·001) and genital itch (60% vs. 8%, P < 0·001). No candidiasis was reported, no deaths occurred and one (1%) serious adverse event was reported in a patient receiving placebo. Ixekizumab was superior to placebo for the treatment of moderate-to-severe GenPs with BSA ≥ 1%. The safety profile of ixekizumab was consistent with previous studies in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

SummaryBackgroundPatients with psoriasis value rapid and complete skin clearance. No head‐to‐head studies have focused on early responses to interleukin (IL)‐17 vs. IL‐23 inhibitors.ObjectivesTo compare early and complete skin clearance by the IL‐17A inhibitor ixekizumab vs. the IL‐23p19 inhibitor guselkumab.Methods IXORA‐R, a 24‐week, randomized, double‐blinded study, enrolled adults with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis [static Physician's Global Assessment of Disease (sPGA) score of ≥ 3, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≥ 12, and ≥ 10% body surface area]. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive the approved dose of subcutaneous ixekizumab or guselkumab. Primary end point was 100% improvement in PASI (PASI 100) at week 12. Major secondary end points included other levels of improved PASI and sPGA at different time points. Comparisons were made using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test with a multiple testing strategy. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data. After the completion of the study, the final secondary end point (PASI 100 at 24 weeks) and safety data through week 24 will be reported.ResultsIn total, 1027 patients were randomized. The primary end point PASI 100 at week 12 was met [215/520 ixekizumab (41%); 126/507 guselkumab (25%); P < 0·001]. All major secondary end points measured up to week 12 were met, including PASI 50 at week 1 and PASI 75 at week 2. Serious adverse event frequency was 3% for each group; no new safety signals were identified.ConclusionsIxekizumab was superior to guselkumab for rapidly improving signs and symptoms in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis by week 12. Adverse events were similar to previous ixekizumab and guselkumab studies. Compared with the IL‐23 inhibitor guselkumab, ixekizumab can offer complete skin clearance more rapidly to patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. What's already known about this topic? Patients with plaque psoriasis desire both high levels of clearance and rapid onset of treatment effects.Ixekizumab, a high‐affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)‐17A, has demonstrated greater and faster skin clearance than etanercept and ustekinumab, with consistent long‐term efficacy, safety and durability of response.Clinical trial data and systematic reviews have suggested that IL‐17 inhibitors can improve a patient's psoriasis more rapidly than IL‐23 inhibitors. What does this study add? The head‐to‐head study design directly compares the efficacy and speed of response of ixekizumab and the IL‐23 inhibitor guselkumab in moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis.The primary end point was met, showing superiority of ixekizumab over guselkumab for achieving complete skin clearance at week 12.The safety profile of ixekizumab was consistent with previous studies.Ixekizumab can deliver patients complete skin clearance and improved quality of life more rapidly than guselkumab.

Efalizumab (anti-CD11a), a humanized monoclonal antibody, blocks multiple T-cell-dependent functions implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, including T-cell activation, migration to the skin, reactivation in psoriatic skin and interactions with keratinocytes. This multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous efalizumab 1.0 mg kg-1 once weekly for 12 weeks compared with placebo in a population that included high-need patients, defined as those for whom at least two systemic therapies were unsuitable because of lack of efficacy, intolerance or contraindication. Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis [involvement of >or=10% of total body surface area and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)>or=12.0 at screening] were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive efalizumab or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving >or=75% PASI improvement (PASI-75 response) at week 12 in the intention-to-treat population; secondary endpoints included changes in PASI, static Physician's Global Assessment, Physician's Global Assessment of change from baseline and percentage of body surface area affected. Results We enrolled 793 patients (529 received efalizumab and 264 placebo), including 526 high-need patients (342 received efalizumab and 184 placebo). Week 12 PASI-75 rates were 29.5% for efalizumab compared with 2.7% for placebo among high-need patients (P<0.0001) and 31.4% for efalizumab compared with 4.2% for placebo in the full study population (P<0.0001). for all secondary efficacy endpoints showed superiority of efalizumab over placebo in both the high-need and the full populations. Efalizumab demonstrated a favourable safety profile, without evidence of systemic toxicity, in both the high-need group and the overall study population. The efficacy and safety of efalizumab therapy were comparable between high-need patients and the more general moderate-to-severe psoriasis patient population. In view of its demonstrated efficacy and safety profile, efalizumab represents a valuable option for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, including high-need patients.