Abstract

Geometry learning has an important role in stimulating critical thinking. During the Covid-19 pandemic, synchronous and asynchronous approaches became an alternative in geometry learning. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of geometry learning by combining synchronous and asynchronous approaches in stimulating critical thinking. This study used a mixed design, namely quantitative and qualitative approaches. The sample was mathematics education students who had taken basic calculus and mathematical logic courses. Quantitative data collection used critical thinking worksheets and questionnaires to measure student activities and responses. Qualitative data collection through learning video recordings and researcher notes during learning. The results showed that student activity was high. Details can be explained in the discussion section.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.