Abstract
In recent decades, retention forestry has become an increasingly popular management approach. Previous research has demonstrated that persistence of retained live trees (residuals) is higher when they are larger and more densely packed. Beyond density, minimal research has been done on how differing silviculture treatments post-harvest affect the persistence of these residual trees. Here, we use a silviculture experiment, fully replicated within five sites across Ontario, Canada, to examine how changes in silviculture treatments post-harvest affect residual tree mortality. The five sites in this study include three sites harvested using clearcut with seed tree and two sites harvested using shelterwood systems. Each site included unharvested control plots and a gradient of four silviculture treatments, but harvest intensity did not change within site. We considered mortality to include trees that died post-harvest and either remained standing or blew down. Overall, we found that probability of residual mortality was highly dependent on hierarchical interactions between linked-press (i.e., climate, edaphic conditions, and silvicultural system) and compounded-pulse (i.e., post-harvest silviculture treatments) disturbances. Based on outputs from a structural equation model, press disturbances affected residual tree mortality more than post-harvest pulse disturbances. Post-harvest pulse disturbances increased residual mortality probabilities in seed tree clearcuts but not shelterwoods. However, in seed tree clearcuts, moderate pulse disturbances had similar effects on residual mortality relative to the least intense pulse disturbances. In summary, forest managers can implement moderate intensity pulse disturbances after harvesting without increasing residual tree mortality relative to untreated areas. However, the highest intensities of post-harvest pulse disturbances did not result in complete loss of residuals and, depending on management objectives, the increased loss in residuals and associated loss of ecosystem services may be offset by benefits of higher yield of desired tree species.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.