Abstract
One function of shielding gases used in welding processes, such as hydrogen (H2), oxygen (O2), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen (N2), helium (He), argon (Ar) and their mixtures, is protection of the weld pool against harmful contamination that could generate defects. In addition to this primary function, shielding gases significantly affect the shape of the weld, weld geometry, seam appearance, metallurgical and mechanical properties, welding speed, metal transfer, arc stability or beam and fume emissions. The shielding gas is thus a key factor in determining weld joint properties and welding process efficiency. As welding processes have become enhanced and welding research has advanced, different combinations of shielding gas mixtures have become available under a wide variety of trademarks, each claiming to offer the best efficiency. The shielding gas flow rate in GMAW welding is usually set according to empirical experiment. The flow generally remains unchanged throughout the entire welding process and is set at maximum values of the welding parameters so that there is sufficient gas cover. This setting means, however, that unnecessarily large quantities of shielding gas may be consumed in other phases of the welding process. In view of constantly increasing prices and shortfalls in helium supply, there is a need to optimize the use of shielding gas. Consequently, an ability to closely monitor the shielding gas blend and reduce waste can provide valuable cost savings. This paper examines the effects of shielding gas mixtures and their components, presents a cross-comparison of shielding effects in fusion welding and suggests guidelines for adaptive controllability of shielding gas in advanced adaptive fusion welding. The study reviews scientific case studies and experiments from the point of view of the effect of the shielding gas on the process efficiency and process outcome. The study considers shielding gases for welding of both ferrous metals (i.e. carbon steels, stainless steels, high-strength steels) and non-ferrous metals (i.e. aluminium and its alloys, nickel and its alloys and copper and its alloys). Appropriate choice of shielding gas and use of an optimum flow rate results in better quality in terms of increased productivity, reduced gas consumption and improved weld geometry properties, microstructure and mechanical properties. Although some blends can be used effectively in many different processes, other blends appear process-dependent; they produce far poorer results when utilized in non-appropriate processes. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) and Schlieren techniques can be used for visual sensing of gas flow during fusing welding. Moreover, an adaptive alternative gas supply can improve welding performance and weld quality and reduce harmful fume emission.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.