Abstract

In a cursor-control task in which the motion of the cursor is rotated randomly relative to the movement of the hand, the sensed directions of hand and cursor are mutually biased. In our previous study, we used implicit and explicit measures of the bias of sensed hand direction toward the direction of the cursor and found different characteristics. The present study serves to explore further differences and commonalities of these measures. In Experiment 1, we examined the effects of different relative reliabilities of visual and proprioceptive information on the explicitly and implicitly assessed bias of sensed hand direction. In two conditions, participants made an aiming movement and returned to the start position immediately or after a delay of 6 s during which the cursor was no longer visible. The unimodal proprioceptive information on final hand position in the delayed condition served to increase its relative reliability. As a result, the bias of sensed hand direction toward the direction of the cursor was reduced for the explicit measure, with a complementary increase of the bias of sensed cursor direction, but unchanged for the implicit measure. In Experiment 2, we examined the influence of global context, specifically of the across-trial sequence of judgments of hand and cursor direction. Both explicitly and implicitly assessed biases of sensed hand direction did not significantly differ between the alternated condition (trial-to-trial alternations of judgments of hand and cursor direction) and the blocked condition (judgments of hand or cursor directions in all trials). They both substantially decreased from the alternated to the randomized condition (random sequence of judgments of hand and cursor direction), without a complementary increase of the bias of sensed cursor direction. We conclude that our explicit and implicit measures are equally sensitive to variations of coupling strength as induced by the variation of global context in Experiment 2, but are differently sensitive to variations of the relative reliabilities as induced by our additional unimodal proprioceptive information in Experiment 1.

Highlights

  • In many tasks, the position of ones’ own hand can be sensed visually and proprioceptively, and both sources of information are efficiently combined to obtain a single percept of the hand at a certain position (Van Beers et al, 1999)

  • We are interested in their changes induced by the delay and the associated variation of the relative reliabilities of visual information on cursor position and proprioceptive information on hand position

  • Relative reliabilities were varied by means of a 6-s period at the end of aiming, during which proprioceptive information was available, but visual information was not

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The position of ones’ own hand can be sensed visually and proprioceptively, and both sources of information are efficiently combined to obtain a single percept of the hand at a certain position (Van Beers et al, 1999). We observed such coupling in a cursor-control task (Rand and Heuer, 2013): hand and cursor were clearly distinct percepts, but when discrepancies between their directions of movement were introduced, the sensed directions became mutually attracted. This mutual attraction was asymmetric in that the bias of sensed hand direction toward the direction of the cursor was stronger than the bias of sensed cursor direction toward the direction of the hand

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.