Abstract

Modelling floods and flood-related disasters has become priority for many researchers and practitioners. Currently, there are several options that can be used for modelling floods in urban areas and the present work attempts to investigate effectiveness of different model formulations in modelling supercritical and transcritical flow conditions. In our work, we use the following three methods for modelling one-dimensional (1D) flows: the MIKE 11 flow model, Kutija’s method, and the Roe scheme. We use two methods for modelling two-dimensional (2D) flows: the MIKE21 flow model and a non-inertia 2D model. Apart from the MIKE11 and MIKE21 models, the code for all other models was developed and used for the purposes of the present work. The performance of the models was evaluated using hypothetical case studies with the intention of representing some configurations that can be found in urban floodplains. The present work does not go into the assessment of these models in modelling various topographical features that may be found on urban floodplains, but rather focuses on how they perform in simulating supercritical and transcritical flows. The overall findings are that the simplified models which ignore convective acceleration terms (CATs) in the momentum equations may be effectively used to model urban flood plains without a significant loss of accuracy.

Highlights

  • Flood disaster risk has become an increasingly important problem and a growing issue around the world

  • Since it continues to be at the top of the agenda for many cities, the development of sufficiently accurate and efficient flood modelling tools has become of utmost importance for many researchers and practitioners, and for those dealing with mitigation of floods and flood-related disasters

  • In the models description below, we focus on the momentum equation and different techniques used to deal with supercritical or transcritical flow conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Flood disaster risk has become an increasingly important problem and a growing issue around the world. Some modelling packages make the assumption that the algorithm for subcritical flow does not change the structure but the non-linear CATs in the momentum equations are reduced to zero as Froude number approaches unity (e.g., the case of the MIKE11 hydrodynamic model). This gradual reduction of the CATs has been implemented in [24] to assess its effect on jump movement. Details of these models are further elaborated

Model Description
MIKE11 Modelling System
Kutija Method
Roe Scheme
MIKE21
Non-Inertia 2D Model
Numerical Experiments and Discussion
Discharge
Prismatic channel with variable bedbed gradient
28 Figure and C10
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.