Abstract

Flywheel iso-inertial training has been shown to positively affect muscular strength and sports performance (e.g. agility). However, implementing such eccentrically-biased training during a microcycle needs to be carefully planned due to its purported effects on the neuromuscular system that can last for hours/days post-exercise. This study aimed at using tensiomyography to verify the effects of different inertias during the hip extension exercise on the contractile function of biceps femoris and semitendinosus muscles of the dominant leg for up to 72 hours post-exercise. Thirty participants (24.4 ± 3.4 years) were divided into 0.075 or 0.1 kg·m2 inertia groups and a control group. Magnitude-based analysis was used for the comparisons. Several tensiomyography parameters were changed after both intensities of flywheel exercise (in most cases indicating a decrement in muscle stiffness), whereas most between-group differences suggested that in the semitendinosus muscle, the higher inertia (0.1 kg·m2) influenced the muscle stiffness parameters more (e.g. Dm = maximal radial displacement) while in the biceps femoris, the greater effect was caused by the lower inertia (0.075 kg·m2) (e.g. Tc = contraction time). Most changes in contractile properties of the investigated muscles occur within 24 hours post-exercise, but can persist for up to 72 hours. However, higher inertia (0.1 kg·m2) influenced the stiffness of the semitendinosus muscle more, while in the biceps femoris, the greater effect was caused by the lower inertia (0.075 kg·m2). These findings should be considered by practitioners when prescribing flywheel iso-inertial training.

Highlights

  • Several investigations to date have revealed that eccentric (ECC) training has superior outcomes compared to concentric (CON) training in the development of both muscle hypertrophy and strength [1]

  • The 0.075 kg m2 resulted in higher contraction velocities in both the concentric and eccentric phases, while 0.1 kg m2 resulted in higher rating of perceived exertion

  • In the within-group analyses, several TMG parameters were changed after both intensities of flywheel exercise, whereas most between-group differences were found in < 72h, suggesting that in the ST, the higher inertia (0.1 kg m2) influenced the muscle stiffness parameters more, while in the biceps femoris (BF), the greater effect was caused by the lower inertia (0.075 kg m2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several investigations to date have revealed that eccentric (ECC) training has superior outcomes compared to concentric (CON) training in the development of both muscle hypertrophy and strength [1]. A wide range of ECC paradigms [10, 11] has been developed to focus on ECC actions, among which flywheel iso-inertial resistance training (FLY-RT) has been highlighted, since it shows benefits in both performance and clinical settings [1, 7, 11] In this line, and in spite of the fact that the importance of the type of inertia for the prescription of training has been demonstrated, there is only one work in the literature analysing the impact of different inertias (i.e. loading stimulus) on performance [12]. Two recent investigations [1, 14] employed FLY-RT (inertia of 0.072 kg m2) and demonstrated superior individual muscle use in hamstrings observed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against well-known paradigms to strengthen the hamstrings, such as the Nordic hamstrings or the Russian belt

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.