Abstract
Abstract : The objectives of the present research were (a) to determine whether mental practice instruction enhances gunnery skill acquisition, and (b) to identify individual differences that relate to the use and effectiveness of mental practice. Three measures of individual differences were obtained: (a) the GT composite from the ASVAB, (b) Rotter's (1966) Internal/External (I/E) Scale, and (c) Betts' Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery. Intact platoons of entry-level soldiers were assigned to either an experimental group that received mental practice instruction in addition to their normal gunnery training on the Institutional Conduct-of-Fire Trainer (I-COFT) or to a control group who received only normal I-COFT gunnery training. Students were pretested on their gunnery skills using a standardized I-COFT exercise. Students also completed a questionnaire that assessed their use and evaluation of mental practice techniques. Results from the questionnaire indicated that soldiers in the control group mentally rehearsed gunnery without instruction to do so, although soldiers in the experimental group were more likely to use commonly prescribed mental practice techniques. Two problems, however, make it difficult to reach conclusions about the effectiveness of mental practice in this experiment: (a) students in the control group spontaneously used mental practice group in gunnery performance may have masked any gains due to mental practice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.