Abstract

Antiarrhythmic drugs are often more effective in suppressing ventricular tachycardias than are background premature extrasystoles. The mechanism of action of these agents was examined by studies on the effects of lidocaine and quinidine on post-repolarization refactoriness of both basic and premature action potentials. In the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs, the excitability threshold was relatively constant after the end of repolarization of both basic and premature action potentials. In the presence of lidocaine or quinidine, the strength-interval curves were shifted to the right and superiorly, and the two drugs had different effects on the course of the strength-interval curve and V̇max recovery, presumably due to use-dependent V̇ max block. Moreover, depressions of V̇max and excitability were more marked after the premature action potential than after the basic action potential. These results suggest that lidocaine and quinidine cause more depression of the excitability of second premature contractions than of first premature contractions, and also indicate that for protection against sustained ventricular tachycardias, it may not be necessary to suppress chronic premature ventricular contractions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.