Effects of large-river restoration measures on ecological fish guilds and focal species of conservation in a large European river (Danube, Austria)

Abstract

River engineering measures of the last two centuries have severely impacted the fish coenoses of all larger rivers in Europe by creating river barriers, replacing natural shores with riprap-reinforced banks, and installing artificial structures that changed the hydrology of inshore habitats. As a result, fluvial specialists have declined and were replaced by generalists. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop functioning means and measures to restore stream habitats and re-establish near-natural conditions. In this study, we analyze the effectiveness of four different restoration measures to increase the abundance and ratio of the rheophilic fish guild in general and of two fluvial focal species of conservation, the barbel and nase, in particular. The sampling took place in a free-flowing part of the Austrian Danube, during the monitoring program of a large hydro-engineering project with both economic and ecological targets. We applied a BACI design and used data from three extensive sampling years. The ecologically orientated measures included groynefield adaptations, a bank re-naturalization, and a side arm re-connection. All measures increased the abundance of nase and barbel and also provided suitable conditions for young-of-the-year fishes. The bank re-naturalization, significantly increased both the abundance and the ratio of rheophilic fishes. The side arm re-connection significantly improved the ratio of rheophilic fishes. Both groyne adaptation measures showed positive, but non-significant effects. Consequently, replacing riprap sections with near-natural gravel bars and re-connecting former side arms can be recommended as appropriate measures to support the rheophilic fish guild, whereas groyne adaptations appear to be of limited value. The evaluated restoration measures significantly improved conditions for local populations of target species and coenoses and can be used as building blocks in upscaled, river-wide restoration efforts. A sustainable restoration of the whole river ecosystem, however, requires a holistic approach that also addresses floodplains and catchment-wide issues.