Abstract

To define the difference between the reponses of slowly adapting pulmonary stretch receptors (SARs) to reduced dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) and to administered histamine, experiments were performed in open-chest, artificially ventilated, bilaterally vagotomized rabbits with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Both stimuli caused an increase in tracheal pressure and produced augmentation of SAR activities during inflation and deflation. Isoprenaline treatment that blocked the responses of SARs and P T to histamine had no effect on those to reduced Cdyn. The results suggest that the response characteristics of SARs provoked by histamine administration do not involve the contribution of decreased Cdyn.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.