Abstract
The impressive results of recent clinical trials with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) and sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in terms of cardiovascular protection prompted a huge interest in these agents for heart failure (HF) prevention and treatment. While both classes show positive effects on composite cardiovascular endpoints (i.e. 3P MACE), their actions on the cardiac function and structure, as well as on volume regulation, and their impact on HF-related events have not been systematically evaluated and compared. In this narrative review, we summarize and critically interpret the available evidence emerging from clinical studies. While chronic exposure to GLP-1Ra appears to be essentially neutral on both systolic and diastolic function, irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), a beneficial impact of SGLT-2i is consistently detectable for both systolic and diastolic function parameters in subjects with diabetes with and without HF, with a gradient proportional to the severity of baseline dysfunction. SGLT-2i have a clinically significant impact in terms of HF hospitalization prevention in subjects at high and very high cardiovascular risk both with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D) or HF, while GLP-1Ra have been proven to be safe (and marginally beneficial) in subjects with T2D without HF. We suggest that the role of the kidney is crucial for the effect of SGLT-2i on the clinical outcomes not only because these drugs slow-down the time-dependent decline of kidney function and enhance the response to diuretics, but also because they attenuate the meal-related anti-natriuretic pressure (lowering postprandial hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia and preventing proximal sodium reabsorption), which would reduce the individual sensitivity to day-to-day variations in dietary sodium intake.
Highlights
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased early incidence and severity of heart failure (HF)
Irrespective of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) value—either preserved (HFpEF: LVEF > 50%), mildly reduced (HFmrEF: LVEF 40–50%), or reduced (HFrEF: LVEF < 40%) [2]— the presence of T2D in chronic HF is Natali et al Cardiovasc Diabetol (2021) 20:196 associated with a worse prognosis, namely, increased rates of all cause death (11.6 vs. 7.3%/yr), cardiovascular death (9.4 vs. 5.8%/y), all cause hospitalization (47.3 vs. 32.7%/yr), and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) (13.9 vs. 7.8%/yr)
Two new classes of drugs might change the natural trajectory of the “lethal synergy” of T2D and HF, namely, glucagonlike peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) and sodium– glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i)
Summary
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased early incidence and severity of heart failure (HF). Natali et al Cardiovasc Diabetol (2021) 20:196 associated with a worse prognosis, namely, increased rates of all cause death (11.6 vs 7.3%/yr), cardiovascular death (9.4 vs 5.8%/y), all cause hospitalization (47.3 vs 32.7%/yr), and HHF (13.9 vs 7.8%/yr) This appears to be somewhat greater in patients with HFpEF (adjusted HHR OR: 2.04 [1.68–2.47]) than in those with HFrEF (adjusted OR: 1.64 [1.44–1.86]). Two new classes of drugs might change the natural trajectory of the “lethal synergy” of T2D and HF, namely, glucagonlike peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) and sodium– glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) While both classes show comparable benefits on composite cardiovascular endpoints, their effect on the cardiovascular system and their impact on HF-related events appear rather different, and a direct comparison of their efficacy on cardiac structure and function is currently lacking, possibly leaving decision-making in clinical practice difficult
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.