Abstract
Aerosol nucleation events occurring in the continental boundary layer over the boreal forest region in Finland, during the BIOFOR experiment, have been examined to elucidate the rôle of micrometeorology in promoting such events. Invariably, during the spring campaign of 1999, nucleation events occurred in Arctic and polar air masses during cold air outbreaks. Under clear-sky conditions, typical of these synoptic meteorological patterns, the boundary layer evolution was characterized by the rapid growth of a mixed layer, convection and strong entrainment, first from the residual later and later from the free troposphere. It was found that the freshly nucleated particles were detected within two hours from the onset of strong turbulent kinetic energy, independent of how fast the boundary layer evolved. When considering the growth time from cluster size of = 1 nm to detectable sizes of 3 nm, the nucleation and onset of strong turbulence coincided almost exactly. The most likely site for nucleation to take place was the mixed layer or the entrainment zone, while the forest canopy and the free troposphere could be excluded as the nucleation region. There are several possible explanations for the correlation between the onset of turbulence and nucleation: (1) new aerosols or clusters may have been entrained from the residual layer into the mixed layer where they then (in the case of clusters) underwent growth to detectable sizes; (2) two or more precursor gases may have been mixed with each other over the entrainment zone; (3) the adiabatic cooling in the rising convective plumes and the turbulent fluctuation in temperature and vapors by the entrainment flux may have enhanced aerosol formation; (4) a sudden decrease in preexisting aerosol due to dilution of the mixed layer aerosol by entrained air may have reduced the vapor sink enough to initiate nucleation. However, the lack of vertical profile measurements of nucleation mode aerosols, precursor vapors and turbulent fluctuations throughout and above the mixed-layer results in it remaining an open question as to which one of these processes dominates.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.