Abstract

Weathering damage, as reflected by falling number changes in standing and windrowed red and white wheats, was compared in 14 cultivars grown in small plot trials and in four cultivars grown in field-scale trials. Weathering damage caused a broad range of falling number changes within both the red and white seed coat color classes of cultivars. Mean falling number for the weathering resistant white seed coat class exceeded that of the weathering susceptible red seed coat class in both years, indicating a range of genotypic expression of weathering resistance within both red and white wheats. Falling number was markedly lower in windrowed than in standing wheat following weathering, particularly in the weathering susceptible cultivars. These differences were readily apparent with total rainfall as low as 47 mm during the weathering period. The greater weathering susceptibility of the windrowed than of the standing wheat was attributed to higher moisture contents and slower drying following rains in windrowed compared to standing crops. Test weight was unaffected by harvest treatment. Commercial grades were higher for weathered samples of standing than of windrowed Neepawa wheat at one location.Key words: Triticum aestivum L., falling number, volume weight, red and white seed coat

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.