Effect of the PI-RADS score on adverse surgical outcomes in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

To evaluate the ability of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and a gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT) scan to predict pathological outcomes and also identify a group of men with a <5% risk of histological pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) at pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed during a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) for prostate cancer. We then aimed to compare these results to known risk calculators for LNM, including the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) and Briganti nomograms. Between July 2014 and September 2019 only men who had both a preoperative mpMRI and staging 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT at our institution followed by a RALP with PLND referred to a single specialist uropathology laboratory were considered for inclusion. The data were collected retrospectively prior to February 2019 and in a prospective manner thereafter. A model was built to allocate probabilities of the men with a negative 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan having a <5% risk of histologically LNM at RALP based on the preoperative radiological staging. A total of 233 consecutive men met the inclusion criteria of which 58 men (24.9%) had a LNM identified on PLND histology. The median (range) International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade was 5(1-5) and the median (range) prostate-specific antigen level was 7.4(1.5-72)ng/mL. The median (range) number of resected lymph nodes was 16(1-53) and the median (range) number of positive nodes identified on histology was 2(1-22). Seminal vesicle invasion on mpMRI was more common in node-positive men than in the absence of LNM (31% vs 12%). The maximum standardised uptake value of the primary tumour on 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT was higher in men with LNM (median 9.2 vs 7.2, P=0.02). Suspected LNM were identified in 42/233 (18.0%) men with 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT compared with 22/233 (9.4%) men with mpMRI (P=0.023). The positive and negative predictive value for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 66.7% and 84.3% respectively, compared to 59.1% and 78.7% for mpMRI. A predictive model showed only two men (4.2%) with a negative preoperative 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT would be positive for a histological LNM if they are ISUP Grade < 5 and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) <5; or ISUP Grade 5 with PI-RADS < 4. An inspection of three additional variables: CAPRA score, MSKCC and Briganti nomograms did not improve the predictive probability for this group. However, of the 61 men with ISUP Grade 4-5 malignancy and also a PI-RADS 5 mpMRI, 20 (32.8%) men had a microscopic LNM despite a negative preoperative 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Preoperative 68 Ga-PSMA/PET CT was more sensitive in identifying histological pelvic LNM than 3-T mpMRI. Men with a negative 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT have a lower risk of LNM than predicted with CAPRA scores or MSKCC and Briganti nomograms. We identified that the combination of a negative preoperative 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT, ISUP biopsy Grade <5 and PI-RADS <5 prostate mpMRI, or an ISUP Grade 5 with PI-RADS <4 on mpMRI was associated with a <5% risk of a LNM. The addition of CAPRA scores, MSKCC and Briganti nomograms did not improve the predictive probability within this model. Conversely, men with ISUP Grade 4-5 malignancy associated with a PI-RADS 5 prostate mpMRI had a >30% risk of microscopic LNM despite a negative preoperative 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and this high-risk group would appear suitable for an extended PLND at the time of a radical prostatectomy.

Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after RadicalProstatectomy.

Background Gallium 68 (68Ga) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/MRI may improve detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC). Purpose To compare the sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI with multiparametric MRI for detecting CSPC. Materials and Methods Men with prostate specific antigen levels of 2.5-20 ng/mL prospectively underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI, including multiparametric MRI sequences, between June 2019 and March 2020. Imaging was evaluated independently by two radiologists by using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1. Sensitivity and specificity for CSPC (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥ 2) were compared for 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and multiparametric MRI by using the McNemar test. Decision curve analysis compared the net benefit of each imaging strategy. Results Ninety-nine men (median age, 67 years; interquartile range, 62-71 years) were included; 79% (78 of 99) underwent biopsy. CSPC was detected in 32% (25 of 78). For CSPC, specificity was higher for 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI than multiparametric MRI (76% [95% CI: 62, 86] vs 49% [95% CI: 35, 63], respectively; P < .001). Sensitivity was similar (88% [95% CI: 69, 98] vs 92% [95% CI: 74, 99], respectively; P > .99). For PI-RADS 3 lesions, specificity was also higher for 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI than for multiparametric MRI: 86% (95% CI: 73, 95) versus 59% (95% CI: 43, 74), respectively (P = .002). Decision curve analysis showed that biopsies targeted to PSMA uptake increased the net benefit of multiparametric MRI only among PI-RADS 3 lesions. The net benefit of targeted biopsy for a PI-RADS 3 lesion with PSMA uptake was higher across all threshold probabilities over 8%. The net benefit of targeted biopsy was similar for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, regardless of PSMA uptake. Conclusions Gallium 68 prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/MRI improved specificity for clinically significant prostate cancer compared with multiparametric MRI, particularly in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System grade 3 lesions. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Williams and Estes in this issue.

Introduction: Prostate cancer is a prevalent and potentially lethal malignancy affecting men worldwide. To enhance early detection and accurate risk stratification, various diagnostic methods have been developed. Prostate cancer diagnoses include a digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen analysis and prostate biopsy in case prostate cancer is suspected. Total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) is a widely used, first line and acceptable biomarker for prostate cancer screening. Rising tPSA levels cannot be a definitive diagnosis for prostate cancer and further examination is needed. Мagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an irreplaceable part of prostate cancer diagnosis. The introduction of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI of prostate gland precises the cases in which performance of target biopsy is needed by classifying suspected prostate lеsions according to the probability of detecting prostate cancer. Objectivе: The objective of this study is to assess the correlation between tPSA levels and PI-RADS scores in patients who underwent MRI of the prostate gland due to elevated tPSA levels. Material and methods: A retrospective study of 374 patients medical records was carried out from January 2019 to June 2023. All patients had tPSA over 4 ng/ml and underwent MRI. Lesions were classified according to PI-RADS v2.1. Results: Patients mean age was 67.8 ± 8.2 years. Mean prostate volume was 52.67 ± 19.6 cc. 87.5 % of the patients had a negative rectal digital exam and 12.5 % had a positive one. tPSA levels ranged from 4.10 to 500 ng/ml. Patients were categorized in four groups according to their tPSA levels: group A with tPSA levels ranging from 4 to 9.9 ng/ml; group B – tPSA from 10 to 19.9 ng/ ml; group C – tPSA from 20 to 39.9 ng/ml; group D – tPSA over 40 ng/ml. MRI and PI-RADS v2 scoring were performed in all patients. 29.4 % of the MRI exams found lesions scored as PI-RADS 3, 47.1 % – as PI-RADS 4 and 22.5 % as PI-RADS 5. There were only 3 cases of lesions categorized as PI-RADS 2 in the study. These patients did not undergo a biopsy and were followed up. 33.9 % of patients in group A were c assified with PI-RADS score 3, 52.3 % – PI-RADS score 4 and 13.8 % – PI-RADS 5. In group B 1.8 %were categorized in PI-RADS score 2, 28.9 % – PI-RADS score 3, 44.7 % were PI-RADS 4 and 24.6 % PI-RADS 5. In group C the majority of patients (47.9 % and 32.6 %) had lesions classified as PI-RADS 4 and 5. In group D most of the patients` lesions – 60.7 %, were categorized as PI-RADS 5. Conclusion: There is a significant correlation between PI-RADS score and serum total PSA levels with a tendency of higher PI-RADS scores as the tPSA level reaches 10 ng/ml. Elevation of tPSa levels over 4 ng/ml requires MRI of the prostate gland and PI-RADS classification as a diagnostic and confirmation tool for further decision making.

Background Use of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring system allowed more precise detection of prostate cancer (PCa). Our study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic performance of mp-MRI in detection of PCa. Methods Eighty-six patients suspected to have prostate cancer were enrolled. All patients underwent mp-MRI followed by systematic and targeted trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsies. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of mp-MRI were evaluated. Results Forty-six patients (53.5%) had prostate cancer on targeted and systematic TRUS biopsies. On mp-MRI, 96.6% of lesions with PI-RADS < 3 revealed to be benign by TRUS biopsy, 73.3% of lesions with PI-RADS 4 showed ISUP grades ≥1, whereas all PI-RADS 5 lesions showed high ISUP grades ≥ 3. For PI-RADS 3 lesions, 62.5% of them revealed to be benign and 37.5% showed ISUP grades ≥1 by TRUS biopsy. PI-RADS scores ˃3 had 69.57% sensitivity and 85% specificity for detection of PCa. On adding the equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions, PI-RADS scores ≥3 had higher sensitivity (97.83%), but at the cost of lower specificity (32.5%). Conclusion Mp-MRI using PI-RADS V2 scoring system categories ≤3 and >3 could help in detection of PCa. PI-RADS 3 lesions are equivocal. Including PI-RADS lesions ≥3 demonstrated higher sensitivity, but at the cost of lower specificity for mp-MRI in diagnosis for Pca. Abbreviations CDR: cancer detection rates; DRE: digital rectal examination; ISUP: international society of urological pathology; mp-MRI: multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging; NPV: negative predictive value; PCa: prosatate cancer; PI-RADS: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; PPV: Positive predictive value; PSA: prostate specific antigen; TRUS: transrectal ultrasound.

Objective: To analyze the relationship between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores and the pathological results of transperineal magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion guided biopsy. Methods: The clinical data, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results and prostate puncture biopsies of 517 patients who were assigned to PI-RADS score of 4 or 5 and underwent transperineal magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion guided biopsy at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from June 2019 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the PI-RADS 4 and PI-RADS 5 groups according to their PI-RADS scores and were stratified by their prostate specific antigen (PSA) values (PSA<10 ng/ml vs. PSA 10-20 ng/ml). The pathological negative rates from the biopsy, the distribution of the grade groups according to the grading system by World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP), the detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (CsPCa)between the groups were compared. Results: 369 patients with a PI-RADS score of 4 and 148 patients with a PI-RADS score of 5 were included in our research. The overall detection rates of PCa and CsPCa were 77.8% (402/517) and 66.7% (345/517), respectively. In the PI-RADS 4 group, patients with prostate negative biopsies or in WHO/ISUP 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 grade groups accounted for 28.2%, 12.7%, 20.1%, 17.1%, 18.4% and 3.5%, respectively, whereas in the PI-RADS 5 group the rates were 7.4%, 6.8%, 22.3%, 22.3%, 26.4%, and 14.9%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The detection rates of PCa and CsPCa in the PI-RADS 4 group [71.8% (265/369) vs. 59.1% (218/369), P<0.001] were lower than those of the PI-RADS 5 group [92.6% (137/148) vs. 85.8% (127/148), P<0.001]. In the PI-RADS 4 group, the proportion of patients classified into WHO/ISUP 4-5 grade groups was lower than that of patients in the PI-RADS 5 group [22.0% (81/369) vs 41.2% (61/148) (P<0.001)]. The detection rates of PCa and CsPCa in the PSA<10 ng/ml stratification were less than that in the PSA 10-20 ng/ml stratification[74.1% (281/379) vs. 87.7% (121/138), P=0.001], and [60.9% (231/379) vs. 82.6% (114/138), P<0.001]. For patients with PSA<10 ng/ml, the detection rates of PCa and CsPCa in the PI-RADS 4 group were less than those in the PI-RADS5 group [70.9% (217/306) vs. 87.7% (64/73), P=0.003], and [56.2% (172/306) vs. 80.8% (59/73), P<0.001]. For those with a PSA value of 10-20 ng/ml, the detection rates of PCa and CsPCa in the PI-RADS 4 group were less than those in the PI-RADS 5 group [76.2% (48/63) vs. 97.3% (73/75), P<0.001], and [73.0% (46/63) vs. 90.7% (68/75), P=0.006]. There were statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients with prostate negative biopsy and those falling into WHO/ISUP grade groups 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 (P<0.001) between the PI-RADS 4 group and the PI-RADS 5 group in both stratifications. Conclusions: In this study, the detection rates of CsPCa and PCa in the PI-RADS 4 group were less than those in the PI-RADS 5 group. With the increase of PI-RADS scores, the detection rate of high-grade PCa increased. The same results held for patients with PSA<10 ng/ml or with PSA 10-20 ng/ml.

Introduction: The use of pre-biopsy MRI scans is now a standard of care in the evaluation of men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA); however, the use of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) has been a source of controversy amongst health professionals. The study aimed to analyse our experience with the use of bpMRI in evaluating suspected prostate cancer in conjunction with other clinical indicators, such as PSA density (PSAD) and family history of prostate cancer.Methods: This retrospective, single-centre study consisted of 404 patients who had an MRI due to elevated PSA and subsequent prostate biopsies.Result: The average age of the study population was 69.7±7.3 years, with the majority of the patients above 70 years. A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between PSAD and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores (r=0.2, p<0.001). Higher PSAD groups showed an increased proportion of PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions. There was a significant positive correlation (r=0.2, p<0.001) between PSAD and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, indicating that the detection of clinically significant and higher-grade prostate cancer increases with PSAD. High-risk prostate cancers (ISUP grades 4 and 5) were detected in the high-risk category of PSAD (14.6% and 18%, respectively). PI-RADS scores correlated significantly with ISUP grades (r=0.3, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that bpMRI-detected PI-RADS scores significantly correlated with PSAD, histological diagnosis (ISUP grade), and clinically significant prostate cancer detection. bpMRI has a role in the diagnostic value of prostate cancer when combined with PSAD and a family history of prostate cancer. It is effective in detecting clinically significant prostate cancers at a lower cost and shorter time while eliminating the potential harm of the use of gadolinium.

228 Background: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores can help identify clinically significant prostate cancer and improve patient selection for prostate biopsies. However, the role of PI-RADS scores in patients already diagnosed with prostate cancer remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of PI-RADS scores with prostate cancer upstaging. Upstaging on final pathology is a surrogate for biochemical recurrence, morbidity, and mortality. Methods: All patients from a single high-volume institution who underwent a prostate multiparametric MRI and radical prostatectomy between 2016-2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to investigate potential associations with upstaging events, defined by pT3, pT4, or N1 on final pathology. A logistic regression model and receiver operative characteristic curves were constructed for the prediction of upstaging events based on PI-RADS score, prostate-specific antigen density (PSA-D), and biopsy Gleason grade groups. Results: 294 patients were included in final analysis. Upstaging events occurred in 137 (46.5%) of patients. On univariable analysis, patients who were upstaged on final pathology had significantly higher PI-RADS scores (OR 2.34 95% 1.64 - 3.40, p &lt; 0.001) but similar PSA-D (OR 2.70 95% 0.94 – 8.43, p = 0.188) compared to patients who remained pT1 or pT2 on final pathology. On multivariable analysis, PI-RADS remained independently significantly associated with upstaging, suggesting it is an independent risk predictor for upstaging. Lymph node metastasis only occurred in patients with PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions (n = 15). Our model using PSA-D, biopsy Gleason grade, and PI-RADS had a predictive AUC of 0.69 for upstaging events, an improvement from 0.59 using biopsy Gleason grade alone. Conclusions: PI-RADS scores are independent predictors for upstaging events and may play an important role in forecasting biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastasis. PI-RADS scores could improve shared decision making and help set expectations with patients. Modern nomograms should be updated to include PI-RADS to predict lymph node metastases and the likelihood of biochemical recurrence more accurately.[Table: see text]

MP44-03 PI-RADS 5 LESIONS WITHIN THE TRANSITION ZONE ARE ASSOCIATED WITH DECREASED DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER VERSUS PERIPHERAL ZONE LESIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING MRI FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSY

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores can help identify clinically significant prostate cancer and improve patient selection for prostate biopsies. However, the role of PI-RADS scores in patients already diagnosed with prostate cancer remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of PI-RADS scores with prostate cancer upstaging. Upstaging on final pathology harbors a higher risk for biochemical recurrence with important implications for additional treatments, morbidity, and mortality. All patients from a single high-volume institution who underwent a prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and radical prostatectomy between 2016 and 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to investigate potential associations with upstaging events, defined by pT3, pT4, or N1 on final pathology. A logistic regression model was constructed for the prediction of upstaging events based on PI-RADS score, prostate-specific antigen density (PSA-D), and biopsy Gleason grade groups. We built receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves to measure the area under the curve of different predictive models. Two hundred and ninety-four patients were included in the final analysis. Upstaging events occurred in 137 (46.5%) of patients. On univariable analysis, patients who were upstaged on final pathology had significantly higher PI-RADS scores (odds ratio [OR] 2.34 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-3.40, p < 0.001) but similar PSA-D (OR 2.70 95% 0.94-8.43, p = 0.188) compared with patients who remained pT1 or pT2 on final pathology. On multivariable analysis, PI-RADS remained independently significantly associated with upstaging, suggesting it is an independent risk predictor for upstaging. Lymph node metastasis only occurred in patients with PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions (n = 15). Our model using PSA-D, biopsy Gleason grade, and PI-RADS had a predictive AUC of 0.69 for upstaging events, an improvement from 0.59 using biopsy Gleason grade alone. PI-RADS scores are independent predictors for upstaging events and may play an important role in forecasting biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastasis. Modern nomograms should be updated to include PI-RADS to predict lymph node metastases and the likelihood of biochemical recurrence more accurately.

MP20-09 MRI-BASED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR POSTOPERATIVE BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE USING THE PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (PI-RADS) SCORES AND CAPSULAR CONTACT LENGTH

PD17-08 IMPACT OF SERIAL PROSTATE MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI ON TREATMENT FREE SURVIVAL IN MEN ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE

To develop and validate a nomogram to improve the specificity of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for clinically significant prostate cancer on targeted fusion biopsy. A retrospective review of patients who underwent fusion biopsy for PI-RADS 3-5 lesions using UroNav and Artemis systems between 2016 and 2022 was performed. Patients were divided into those with CS disease on fusion biopsy (Gleason grade group ≥2) versus those without. Multivariable analysis was used to identify variables associated with CS disease. A 100-point nomogram was constructed, and ROC curve was generated. 1485 lesions (1032 patients) were identified, 510 (34%) were PI-RADS 3, 586 (40%) were PI-RADS 4, and 389 (26%) were PI-RADS 5. Of these, 11% of PI-RADS 3, 39% of PI-RADS 4, and 61% of PI-RADS 5 showed CS disease. CS disease was associated with older age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06, p < 0.01), previous negative biopsy (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.36-0.74, p < 0.01), presence of multiple PI-RADS 3-5 lesions (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83, p < 0.01), peripheral zone location (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.30-2.70, p < 0.01), PSA density (OR 1.48 per 0.1 unit, 95% CI 1.33-1.64, p < 0.01), PI-RADS score 4 (OR 3.28, 95% CI 2.21-4.87, p < 0.01), and PI-RADS score 5 (OR 7.65, 95% CI 4.93-11.85, p < 0.01). Area under ROC curve was 82% for nomogram compared to 75% for PI-RADS score alone. We report a nomogram that combines PI-RADS score with other clinical parameters. The nomogram outperforms PI-RADS score for the detection of CS prostate cancer.

MRI-targeted biopsy (T-Bx) for which Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) assessment categories are useful has been shown to more accurately detect clinically significant prostate cancer. However, the prognostic significance of the PI-RADS in prostate cancer patients needs further investigation. In the present study, we compared radical prostatectomy findings and postoperative oncologic outcomes in men with prostate cancer initially undergoing T-Bx for PI-RADS 3 vs. 4 vs. 5 lesions. We assessed consecutive patients undergoing T-Bx with concurrent systematic biopsy (S-Bx), followed by radical prostatectomy. Within our Surgical Pathology database, we identified a total of 207 men where prostatic adenocarcinoma was detected on either S-Bx or T-Bx, or both. Prostate cancer was detected on S-Bx only (n = 32; 15%), T-Bx only (n = 39; 19%), or both S-Bx and T-Bx (n = 136; 66%). These patients had PI-RADS 3 (n = 42; 20%), 4 (n = 86; 42%), or 5 (n = 79; 38%) lesions, while T-Bx detected cancer in 31 (74%) of PI-RADS 3 cases, 72 (84%) of PI-RADS 4 cases, and 72 (91%) of PI-RADS 5 cases. There were no significant differences in any of the clinicopathologic features examined, including tumor grade on biopsy or prostatectomy and pT or pN stage, among the PI-RADS 3 vs. 4 vs. 5 groups, except a significantly higher rate of positive margin and significantly larger tumor volume in PI-RADS 5 cases than in PI-RADS 3 cases. Univariate and multivariable analyses revealed significantly higher risks of biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy in patients with PI-RADS 5 lesion than in those with PI-RADS 3 or 4 lesion. Additionally, compared with respective controls, detection of any grade cancer (P = 0.046) or Grade Group 2 or higher cancer (P = 0.005) on T-Bx was associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence in patients with PI-RADS 5 lesion, but not in those with PI-RADS 3 or 4 lesion. PI-RADS 5 lesions were thus found to independently predict a significantly poorer postoperative prognosis. Moreover, the failure of detection of any grade cancer or clinically significant cancer on T-Bx of PI-RADS 5 lesion may particularly indicate favorable outcomes in radical prostatectomy cases.

Background. Focal therapies for prostate cancer (PCa) can preserve the quality of life; however, their application is limited by lack of confidence in identifying the exact tumor location.Aim. To evaluate the utility of fusion biopsy for choosing PCa patients eligible for focal therapy with subsequent confirmation by the analysis of radical prostatectomy (RPE) samples.Materials and methods. This study included 122 patients with histologically verified stage Т1–2N0M0 PCa treated in N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology, a branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center. Their mean age was 65.2 ± 6.8 years. All patients underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fusion biopsy (samples were collected from targeted areas in combination with a standard biopsy), followed by histological examination of biopsy samples and mapping of the affected areas. Twenty-eight patient underwent RPE.Results. Study participants were distributed as follows by their Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score: 5 points in 23 patients (18.9 %), 4 points in 57 patients (46.7 %), and 3 points in 42 patients (34.4 %). Targeted biopsy revealed cancer in 105 out of 122 patients (86.1 %) in at least one sample. Seventeen targeted biopsy samples were negative. The majority of patients had ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade 1 (n = 57; 46.8 %) and grade 2 (n = 33; 27.0 %) tumors. Comparison of biopsy findings and results of pathological examination of the removed prostate demonstrated significant discrepancies in the distribution of cases by their ISUP grades. Almost half of the patients (46.8 %) were diagnosed with ISUP grade 1 tumors after biopsy, while the assessment of RPE specimen demonstrated ISUP grade 1 tumors only in 21.4 % of patients. ISUP grade 3 tumors were diagnosed in 16.4 % and 35.7 % of patients using biopsy- and RPE-derived specimens, respectively. The proportions of ISUP grade 2, 4, and 5 tumors were similar with both methods. In 27 out of 28 cases, examination of biopsy- and RPE-derived specimens demonstrated complete agreement in terms of tumor location. Importantly, this study included only patients with histologically confirmed PCa; so we didn’t evaluate the effectiveness of biopsy for cancer diagnosis. Focal therapy could have been considered in 22 out of 28 patients (78.6 %) who underwent RPE. This proportion of focal therapy-eligible patients is almost equal to that identified by fusion biopsy (75.4 %).Conclusion. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in combination with targeted and multifocal prostate biopsy allow precise identification of candidates eligible for focal therapy with a relatively low risk of an erroneous conclusion.