Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) lowering is considered neuroprotective in patients with cerebral small vessel disease; however, more intensive regimens may increase cerebral hypoperfusion. This study examined the effect of standard vs intensive BP treatment on cerebral perfusion in patients with severe small vessel disease. To investigate whether standard vs intensive BP lowering over 3 months causes decreased cerebral perfusion in small vessel disease. This randomized clinical trial took place at 2 English university medical centers. Patients were randomized via a central online system (in a 1:1 ratio). Seventy patients with hypertension and with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed symptomatic lacunar infarct and confluent white matter hyperintensities were recruited between February 29, 2012, and October 21, 2015, and randomized (36 in the standard group and 34 in the intensive group). Analyzable data were available in 62 patients, 33 in the standard group and 29 in the intensive group, for intent-to-treat analysis. This experiment examines the 3-month follow-up period. Patients were randomized to standard (systolic, 130-140 mm Hg) or intensive (systolic, <125 mm Hg) BP targets, to be achieved through medication changes. Cerebral perfusion was measured using arterial spin labeling; the primary end point was change in global perfusion between baseline and 3 months, compared between treatment groups by analysis of variance. Linear regression compared change in perfusion against change in BP. Magnetic resonance imaging scan analysis was masked to treatment group. Among 62 analyzable patients, the mean age was 69.3 years, and 60% (n = 37) were male. The mean (SD) systolic BP decreased by 8 (12) mm Hg in the standard group and by 27 (17) mm Hg in the intensive group (P < .001), with mean (SD) achieved pressures of 141 (13) and 126 (10) mm Hg, respectively. Change in global perfusion did not differ between treatment groups: the mean (SD) change was -0.5 (9.4) mL/min/100 g in the standard group vs 0.7 (8.6) mL/min/100 g in the intensive group (partial η2, 0.004; 95% CI, -3.551 to 5.818; P = .63). No differences were observed when the analysis examined gray or white matter only or was confined to those achieving target BP. The number of adverse events did not differ between treatment groups, with a mean (SD) of 0.21 (0.65) for the standard group and 0.32 (0.75) for the intensive group (P = .44). Intensive BP lowering did not reduce cerebral perfusion in severe small vessel disease. isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN37694103.

Highlights

  • To investigate whether standard vs intensive Blood pressure (BP) lowering over 3 months causes decreased cerebral perfusion in small vessel disease

  • No differences were observed when the analysis examined gray or white matter only or was confined to those achieving target BP

  • Characteristics of those who dropped out (n = 6) were descriptively similar to those who remained in the study. For those who dropped out, the mean age was 69.4 years, 4 of 6 were male, the mean baseline systolic BP was 152 mm Hg, and the mean baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score was 24.50. For those who stayed in the study, the mean age was 69.5 years, 61% (39 of 64) were male, the mean baseline systolic BP was 151 mm Hg, and the mean baseline MoCA was 24.72

Read more

Summary

Methods

PRESERVE Study The PRESERVE study is an ongoing, 2-year, multicenter, randomized clinical trial that tests standard vs intensive BP treatment regimens in patients with severe SVD on outcomes of WM disease (assessed by diffusion-tensor imaging) and cognition. This article presents a nested substudy that investigates CBF change over the first 3 months of the trial. Participants were randomized (stratified via site) to either the standard (systolic BP target, 130-140 mm Hg) or intensive (systolic BP target,

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.