Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the effects of maturity at harvest and row spacing on fermentative profile, aerobic stability, and nutritional value of biomass sorghum (BRS 716) silage. The experiment was conducted using a split-plot completely randomized block design with three row spacings (45, 70, and 90 cm) and four maturities at harvest (70, 100, 130, and 160 days) and eight replications. Polyvinyl chloride silos of known weight measuring 50 cm length and 10 cm diameter were used for [...]

Highlights

  • Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) has been grown in several regions of the world for silage due to its high mass production per unit area, good nutritional value, tolerance to water deficit, pests, and diseases, and appropriate fermentation characteristics when harvested at the correct maturity

  • The objective was to evaluate the effects of maturity at harvest and row spacing on fermentative profile, aerobic stability, and nutritional value of biomass sorghum (BRS 716) silage

  • BRS 716 biomass sorghum should be planted at 70-cm row spacing and harvested at 160 days for silage production based on fermentative profile, dry matter losses, and nutritional characteristics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) has been grown in several regions of the world for silage due to its high mass production per unit area, good nutritional value, tolerance to water deficit, pests, and diseases, and appropriate fermentation characteristics when harvested at the correct maturity. BRS 716, released in 2014 by EMBRAPA Maize and Sorghum, is an important alternative crop for cogeneration of energy by direct biomass burning in thermoelectric and sugarcane ethanol industries. This sorghum cultivar has potential for ensiling and use in ruminant diets due to its high mass productivity, reaching up to 50 t DM/ha. According to Bernardes et al (2018) and Monção et al (2019, 2020), plant maturity can modify the processes involved with fermentation of the ensiled mass and nutritional value of the silage produced. BRS 716 with equilibrium between mass yield and nutritional value of silage

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.