Abstract

Besides obvious ductility benefits, low-energy, and sustainable development of FRC is still a major challenge. Plant-based fibers owing to their lower costs and minimal embodied carbon have attracted huge interest in concrete technology. This experimental study explored the effects of using different types of plant fibers in HSC. Three fibers namely JF, BF, and CF were used in HSC at varying volume fractions (0%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.5%). The performance of plant fibers in HSC was compared with that of PF. According to the findings, the workability decreased with the rise in plant fiber content and JF addition was more deleterious to workability as compared to other plant fibers. JF yielded slightly better results than synthetic PF and other plant fibers in CS. In STS and FS, both BF and JF yielded a better performance as compared to synthetic PF and CF. The recommended dose of plant fibers for maximum STS and FS is 0.3% by volume. At a volume of 0.3%, ‘BF’, ‘JF’ and ‘CF’ resulted in net increases of 20%, 24% and 15% in STS of plain HSC, respectively. In the case of FS, 0.3% volume of BF, JF and CF yielded net increases of 25%, 23%, and 17.5%, respectively. Generally, a higher volume fraction (>0.5%) of plant fibers was harmful to the imperviousness and capillary resistance of HSC. This study encourages the application of silica fume and a superplasticizer to control the negative effects of plant fibers on HSC mixes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.