Abstract

Background and ObjectiveRoxadustat is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor in phase III development for the treatment of anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease. This study evaluated the effects of moderate hepatic impairment on roxadustat pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability.MethodsThis was an open-label study in which eight subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (liver cirrhosis Child–Pugh score 7–9) and eight subjects with normal hepatic function (matched for body mass index, age and sex) received a single oral 100 mg roxadustat dose under fasted conditions. Blood samples were collected until 144 h post-dose in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and until 96 h post-dose in subjects with normal hepatic function.ResultsIn subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) from the time of drug administration to infinity (AUC∞) and observed maximum concentration (Cmax) were 23 % higher [geometric least-squares mean ratio (GMR) 123 %; 90 % CI 86.1–175] and 16 % lower (GMR 83.6 %; 90 % CI 67.5–104), respectively, than in subjects with normal hepatic function. Mean terminal half-life (t½) appeared to be longer (17.7 vs. 12.8 h) in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, however intersubject variability on apparent total systemic clearance after single oral dosing (CL/F), apparent volume of distribution at equilibrium after oral administration (Vz/F) and t½ was approximately twofold higher. Erythropoietin (EPO) baseline-corrected AUC from administration to the last measurable EPO concentration (AUCE,last) and maximum effect (Emax) were 31 % (GMR 68.95 %; 90 % CI 29.29–162.29) and 48 % (GMR 52.29 %; 90 % CI 28.95–94.46) lower, respectively, than in subjects with normal hepatic function. The single oral roxadustat dose was generally well tolerated.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated the effect of moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of roxadustat relative to subjects with normal hepatic function. These differences are not expected to be of clinical significance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.