Abstract

<h3>Introduction</h3> Electronic vaping devices deliver nicotine in a manner similar to conventional cigarettes. While cigarette smoking has been proven to increase periodontal disease and oropharyngeal cancer risks, extensive stud- ies on the health effects of vaping have yet to be published. A JUUL consists of a device containing a removable cartridge, or JUULpod, that holds an e-liquid of various flavors and nicotine concentrations. Although electronic cigarette use is viewed as a healthy alternative to conventional cigarette smoking, the long-term health effects of vaping are not known at this time. Therefore, this study is to determine the effects of JUUL e-liquid concentrates on the survival and function of oral fibroblasts and osteoblasts. <h3>Materials and Methods</h3> Cells were treated for 1, 6, and 24 hours with various percentages (2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 10%) of JUULpod eliquid containing 59 mg/ml nicotine in a mix of propylene glycol, glycerine, benzoic acid, and fla- voring agents. The flavors tested included mint, Virginia tobacco, mango, and creme. Cell survival was assessed fluorometrically using Calcein-AM. Alkaline phosphatase activity was measured by enzymatic assay. Osteoblast transcript expression was evaluated using polymerase chain reaction and gel electrophoresis. <h3>Results</h3> Concentrations of JUULpod e-liquid up to 25% extract did not significantly reduce cell survival for all fla- vors. Concentrations of JUULpod e-liquid up to 25% extract drastically reduced alkaline phosphatase activity in osteoblasts. In general, no detectable changes in osteoblast transcript were noted following exposure to JUUL extracts. However, mint flavored extracts selectively reduced expressions of BMP4, TGFbeta1, osteoprotegerin, periostin, as well as collagens III, V, and VIII. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Based on these results, JUULpod e-liquid did not reduce the survival of osteoblasts or oral fibrob- lasts. However, JUULpod e-liquid does significantly reduce alkaline phosphatase activity of osteoblasts. This study supports the likelihood that electronic cigarettes would be less harmful to oral cells than conventional cigarettes.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.