Abstract

To assess whether cochlear implant (CI)-related magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifact and visibility of the internal auditory canal (IAC) can be improved with head positioning and select MRI sequences. CI-related MRI artifact limits the use of CIs in otherwise good candidates because of the need for serial MRIs for monitoring of pathology. This most notably impacts patients with tumors of the cerebellopontine angle and IAC. Two cadaver heads were implanted with either a Med-El CONCERT (fixed magnet) or SYNCHRONY (rotating magnet) device. Each head was imaged in a 1.5T scanner in 11 different positions. The SYNCHRONY-implanted head was also imaged in a 3.0T scanner in seven positions. Artifact size and IAC visibility (graded on a Likert scale) were measured for each head position by a neuroradiologist. The CONCERT CI produced significantly smaller artifact than the SYNCHRONY CI (effect size, 14.65 mm; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between CI models in regard to IAC visibility. No head positions were statistically significantly better than neutral position for minimizing artifact size or IAC visibility, although some positions resulted in significantly larger artifact (effect sizes, 2.1-14.3 mm; p < 0.05) or significantly poorer IAC visibility (effect size, 1.4; p < 0.01). The T2 three-dimensional (CISS/FIESTA) sequence demonstrated significantly smaller artifact than T1 sequences, whereas T1 sequences demonstrated significantly better IAC visibility than T2 sequences. Head positioning and magnetic resonance sequence selection impact CI-related artifact size and IAC visibility.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.