Abstract

Abstract The relative neglect of training by educationists is criticised. It is argued that training is fundamental to many forms of human learning including early moral learning. Training assists learning from early childhood to adulthood and takes different forms at different stages. Training is distinguished from conditioning on the one hand and discovery on the other and it is argued that most of the criticisms of the use of training techniques arise from a misidentification of training with conditioning. Finally, consideration is given to possible cultural and intellectual influences on the current low status of training. Specifically, the influences of the behaviourists and of Rousseau on our present perception of training are discussed. Any explanation has its foundation in training. (Educators ought to remember this.) (Wittgenstein, para. 1967, 419)

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.