Editorial: Probing the limits of youth participation in the translational science of neurodivergence.

As in many other countries, child psychiatry in China has gradually developed from general psychiatry. In the early days of the profession, child psychiatry was considered as psychiatry for "little adults". Child psychiatry in China has gradually developed and expanded since the implementation of Professor Guotai Tao's child psychiatric services in Nanjing in the 1930s. In particular, the profession has developed rapidly since its affiliation with the International Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions (IACAPAP) in 1998. Child psychiatry has been one of the fastest developing advanced international disciplines over the past 10 years. Pediatric psychiatry mainly focuses on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of mental disorders in children, adolescents, and their families. In 1899, the term ''child psychiatry'' (in French) was used as a subtitle in Manheimer 's monograph Les Troubles Mentaux de l'Enfance. The Swiss psychiatrist Moritz Tramer (1882–1963) was probably the first to define child psychiatry, in 1933, in terms of diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis within the medical discipline. In 1934, he founded the Journal of Child Psychiatry (1934–1952), which later became Acta Paedopsychiatrica (1953–1994). The first academic pediatric psychiatry department was established in 1930 at the Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore by Leo Kanner (1894–1981). Since then, the clinical practice, research, and teaching of child psychiatry have gradually developed around the world.1 There have been three stages to the development of children's psychiatry in China. The first is the exploration and development period, which occurred mainly during the 1930s to the 1950s. This period was characterized by the introduction of Western models by experts and the exploratory development of child psychiatric services. Professor Yulin Cheng, Guotai Tao, and Yonghe Ling other professors are the pioneers. The second stage is the initial development period, which occurred from the 1950s to the late 1970s. Child psychiatric clinics and/or wards were established in Nanjing, Shanghai, Beijing, Guangzhou, Sichuan, Hunan and other places and child psychiatric teams were formed. Although there was a pause in the early 1970s, child psychiatric service models continued to be developed. The third period, from the late 1970s to the present, was characterized by rapid progress. The development of child psychiatry has been promoted mainly since the economic reform and opening-up in China, with the transformation of the medical model from a pure biomedical model to a biopsychosocial medical model. Psychiatrists, pediatricians, and psychologists have begun to focus on child mental health and have conducted some interdisciplinary research and practice. Following the establishment of the Nanjing Child Mental Health Research Center, many provinces and cities have established child mental health centers. Psychiatric hospitals or mental health institutes affiliated to major medical universities in Nanjing, Beijing, Hunan, Sichuan, Shanghai and other places have successively established Master's and doctoral training sites for child psychiatry and applied psychology. Relevant disciplines and research institutions such as child health care, behavioral pediatrics, special education schools, and autism training centers have successively joined the ranks of child mental health services. In particular, Professor Guotai Tao founded the Nanjing Child Mental Health Research Center in 1984. In August 1987, the center was appointed by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a scientific research and training cooperation center, and was appointed by the Chinese Ministry of Health (now the National Health Commission) as a child mental health guidance center. Many child psychiatrists and mental health workers have been trained, and academic exchanges have been promoted in China and abroad.2 With the rapid development of disciplines, Chinese child psychiatry has reached an internationally renowned and advanced level. Multidisciplinary participation in child psychiatry is good. For example, the psychology of child development, developmental behavior pediatrics, child neurology, child health care, education, and sociology have begun to attach importance to clinical practice and research on mental health. A growing number of universities and colleges offer degrees for social workers in clinical psychology and childcare. In addition, with more primary care centers in the community, primary care physicians can implement screening and follow-up for children with mental health disorders. However, the primary care providers still need more education and training. To address this problem, the National Health Commission has been advocating multilevel collaboration. Pediatricians and primary care physicians across the country are now being trained in early diagnosis and basic treatment for common mental disorders in children. They are taught to screen patients for signs of developmental disorders by checking, for example, whether a 3-month-old baby's eyes can follow moving objects or whether an 18-month-old child can make eye contact. The problem of the shortage of child psychiatrists has been partially solved.3 Children and adolescent mental health problems are related to a country's development and to global changes. About 20% of children and adolescents worldwide experience mental health disorders. The major challenges for children and adolescents with mental disorders are stigma, isolation, discrimination, and the lack of access to health care and education facilities. Obviously, children and adolescents are vulnerable groups; they have no political power and their mental health problems are complicated. The mental health of children and adolescents requires multisectoral cooperation and the attention of the whole society. In particular, the protection afforded by government actions and policies is crucial. Policies must be designed to ensure that children and adolescents can access even the most basic mental healthcare. However, there are few countries worldwide that provide specific policies for the mental health needs of children and adolescents.4 China has a large population of children. Rapid economic development and social reforms in recent years have had a substantial impact on the mental health of children and adolescents. Increasing social pressures and workers migration, and changes in family planning, have changed traditional family structures and social support systems.3 As part of development and progress within China, the Chinese government has initiated a series of policies and regulations to promote mental health. Some of these policies are aimed at promoting mental health in children and adolescents; for example, "The Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Minors", "The Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of Women and Children", "The Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Disabled Persons", "Mental Health Law of the People's Republic of China", and programmatic documents such as the "Healthy China 2030 Planning Outline", "National Program of Outline for Action for Child Development in China (2011–2020)", "Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder'', ''Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Treatment and Rehabilitation of Children with Autism'', and ''Technical Specifications for Children's Mental Health Care''.5-10 These reflect how the support of national policies has driven the development of child psychiatry. Major national basic and clinical research projects have invested in child psychiatry research, such as the National Natural Science Foundation of China, which has supported national research and development plans in key health areas. Research by a team led by Professor Zhang Dai has demonstrated that FMR1, DISC1, EN2, and SHANK3 genes are related to autism. Studies by a team led by Professor Kun Xia and Jingping Zhao have shown that XRXN1, GRIN2B, RELN, and DAB1 genes may be antecedents of autism. Such research has been published in several high quality academic journals in recent years.11, 12 Some research of the National "12th and 13th Five-Year Plan" scientific and technological support projects led by Professor Yi Zheng, on "The Epidemiological Study of Child Mental Disorders in China" and "Comprehensive Intervention Strategies for Chronic Non-communicable Diseases with Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder". These show that Chinese child psychiatry has become a discipline supported by the national key research project. Traditional research group in child psychiatry include the team led by Professor Guotai Tao, Jie Lin and Xiaoyan Ke about autism, mental retardation and childhood schizophrenia; team led by Professor Yufeng Wang on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; team led by Professor Xiaoling Yang and Jing Liu about autism spectrum disorders; team led by Professor Xuerong Li, Linyan Su and Xuerong Luo on epidemiological surveys and tool scales for child mental disorders; team led by Professor Rene Xin, Yasong Du and Wenhong Chen on epidemiological investigation of children's behavior problems and related research on child psychology and family therapy; team led by Professor Shiji Zhang, Yi Zheng, Yonghua Cui and Fan He on tics and related disorders; and team led by Professor Youhe Shan, Lanting Guo and Yi Huang on behavioral scales and tic disorders. The above studies have published valuable articles in academic journals and won many awards. Child psychiatrists need to be dedicated. The treatment of patients with mental illness is difficult and often daunting, and children's mental health disorders are particularly difficult to treat. Treatment of children with autism or mania requires tackling difficult problems and good practice in basic clinical skills. In China, child psychiatrists experience low returns and low income. The number of child psychiatric inpatients and outpatients is constantly increasing, and their treatment often relies on the dedication of child psychiatrists. To treat such patients, there are now more than 10 centers, nearly 1000 beds, and dozens of special education centers, such as autism rehabilitation centers. To care for left-behind children, children infected with AIDS, children affected by natural disasters such as earthquakes, and children with substance abuse and internet addiction, many child mental health workers and full-time child psychiatrists have formed competent national and local emergency response teams. Child psychiatrists are now available to help children to cope with a variety of social disasters, such as the Wenchuan earthquake or the "3.01" terrorist incident in Kunming. The development of modern child psychiatry in China is interlinked with foreign exchange. Since Professor Guotai Tao's studies in the United States in 1940, Chinese child psychiatry has been continuously introducing and incorporating foreign advanced diagnosis and treatment and research concepts. At present, Professor Tao has discussed diagnostic issues with international authoritative experts in foreign journals and participated in the preparation of the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Professor Tao was the first international participant in efforts to promote the integration of child and adult psychiatry and the popularization of the notion of the lifelong effects of mental illness, such as the Cross-Strait Summit Forum, and domestic and foreign academic institutions and academic exchanges, such as the Asian Society for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions (ASCAPAP) and the International Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions (IACAPAP). Chinese child psychiatrists have attended and contributed to both of the latter societies. Since the 1930s, older generations of individuals, such as Yulin Cheng, Guotai Tao, and Xueshi Chen, have made substantial contributions to the development of the discipline of child psychiatry. In 1989, Professor Jie Lin set up and led the Child Psychiatric Group of the Chinese Medical Association Psychiatry Branch. Professor Guotai Tao served as a consultant of the Group. Almost at the same time, the Chinese Mental Health Association established the Child and Adolescent Professional Committee, with Xuerong Li as director. Xueshi Chen serves as a consultant. Since then, two academic organizations have held annual meetings or training courses. In 1998, Professor Shiji Zhang, Yi Zheng, and Linyan Su participated in the IACAPAP congress and joined this organization, which is the most highly regarded academic organization in international child psychiatry. Chinese child psychiatry is fully in line with international developments in child psychiatry. In 2003, Professor Yi Zheng and Linyan Su attended the WHO Expert Headquarters "Concern for Children and Adolescents with Mental Disorders" meeting as Chinese representatives. In the same year, Professor Yi Zheng participated in the ASCAPAP congress and was elected as an executive member. In 2004, Professor Yi Zheng was appointed onto the IACAPAP executive committee. Professor Yi Zheng created the Cross-Strait Children's Psychiatry Summit Forum, which is held once every 2 years alternately in the mainland of China and Taiwan province, China. The Forum is now in its ninth session and has promoted the rapid development of the discipline. In 2010, the 19th IACAPAP International congress was successfully held in Beijing. This was the first time that this congress had been held in a developing country. Professor Yi Zheng served as Executive Chairman, and Professor Jing Liu served as Chairman of the organizing committee. Xiulian Gu, Zhu Chen, Wenkang Zhang and the country's main health care officials attended the opening ceremony and delivered speeches. More than 1300 foreign scholars and 500 domestic scholars attended the congress. Yi Zheng was elected onto the ASCAPAP executive committee and was elected Chairman, and Jing Liu was elected Vice-Chairman of ASCAPAP. At the 21st IACAPAP Conference held in South Africa in 2014, Professor Yi Zheng was elected Vice-President of IACAPAP and won the International Child Psychiatry Outstanding Contribution Award, indicating that Chinese child psychiatry has played a major role on the international stage.2 China has a population of more than 1.3 billion individuals, of which 238 million are children younger than 15 years of age.13 Though a nationwide prevalence study is lacking, some regional epidemiological studies show that the prevalence of mental health disorders in children is close to the worldwide prevalence of 20%,14-18 indicating that about 50 million children in China require treatment for mental health disorders. However, there is a scarcity of child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAPs) in China, and there are less than 500 full-time CAPs nationwide. Currently, only a national psychiatrist certification system exists, and there is no child psychiatrist certification system. Instead, students must obtain a postgraduate training certificate or a nationally approved Ph.D. or Master 's degree training certificate to become a child psychiatrist. A recent survey showed that training units for CAPs are mainly concentrated in large and medium-sized cities. Moreover, only a small number of medical personnel in China can diagnose and treat children and adolescents with mental health disorders, and these have insufficient training. Currently available training for child psychiatrists contains insufficient scientific, practical, and problem-solving content. Furthermore, current educational training poorly equips child psychiatrists for subsequent teaching and professional scientific research abilities. Therefore, a greater training focus is needed on more comprehensive qualities and abilities, such as dedication. Although CAPs undertake a long process of training, this mainly comprises postgraduate or doctoral Master's degree training; the national specialized certification system for CAPs has only been piloted in major cities. The CAP training system requires further improvements, and more CAPs are needed.19 China still has a shortage of child psychiatrists. To address this, a new type of multilevel collaboration is currently being implemented. Pediatricians and primary care physicians are also receiving training in child psychiatry. In addition, psychotherapists from other countries have been recruited to help train psychiatrists. China is currently exploring all possible ways to strengthen multilevel collaboration to promote the children's physical and mental health.3 The artificial boundary between children and adults with mental health disorders will be removed: more attention and value will be placed upon the treatment of adult attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), adult autism spectrum disorder (ASD), adult tic disorder, and other issues. Gene diagnosis and classification of child neurological and mental development disorders will become a reality: the detection of genes for susceptibility to ASD, ADHD, tic disorders, child schizophrenia, and child bipolar disorder will become possible. The concept of the supremacy of child mental health will gradually be accepted. More and more studies have confirmed that among the main factors for healthy and successful child developmental, child mental health is of paramount importance. As physical health and nutritional issues have been generally resolved in most parts of China, the impact of mental health on the future success of children will be a core health issue. Therefore, mental health should start with children. The multidisciplinary and multisector nature of child mental health will be further improved: medicine, economics, sociology, and other disciplines will pay close attention to child mental health. In particular, the only-child problem, the problems experienced by elderly parents in raising a second child, the problem of left-behind children, AIDS-infected children, Internet addiction problems, youth suicide, and crime prevention problems will become the focus of social attention. There will be new breakthroughs in early diagnosis and interventions for child mental health disorders: the ICD-11 (containing input from Chinese experts) will soon be released. Early warning indicators for child psychological problems and quantitative assessment techniques for child mental health care will be promoted from the national level to the whole country. Like child vaccination, assessments and interventions for child psychological conditions will benefit every child, which will set a global precedent. Treatment methods for child mental health disorders will be qualitatively improved. In addition to the further optimization of the structure and dosage of antipsychotics, research on functional food will make significant progress, and the use of alternative medicine and traditional Chinese medicine for child mental health disorders will be further clarified. In conclusion, the development of child psychiatry in China is still far behind developed countries, but a golden age of rapid development is approaching. Research on prevention and control of major chronic non-communicable diseases in the Ministry of Science and Technology (No: 2016YFC1306100) None.

Past Imperfect, Future Tense: Psychotherapy and Child Psychiatry

Editorial

Psychiatric Administration: A Comprehensive Text for the Clinician-Executive

Improving access to mental health services for youth and parents.

Seminars in Psychiatric Genetics

A conceptual framework for the revision of the ICD‐10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders

Abstract. Introduction: Sports psychiatry, a field of psychiatry, is a young medical discipline. The aim of this study was to gauge opinions on the following: sports psychiatry as a specialized subdiscipline, its areas of activity among professionals, the desire for interdisciplinary and interprofessional cooperation, and the need for specific sports psychiatry training. Methods: An online survey was performed to assess the views on sports psychiatry of German-speaking professionals in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria in the field of sports psychiatry. Results: Data from 183 professionals were included in the analysis. Most participants classified sports psychiatry as a field of psychiatry (89%), followed by sports medicine (61%) and child and adolescent psychiatry (49%). Mental health and disorders in competitive and elite sport (94%), sport and exercise for the prevention of and as therapy for mental disorders (84%), and sport-specific mental health problems and disorders in popular sport (80%) were reported by all the participants as areas of activity within sports psychiatry. Most of the participants stated the importance of interdisciplinary and interprofessional collaboration with sports psychiatry’s areas of activity. While 84% of the participants emphasized the necessity for specific training in sports psychiatry, a different picture emerged as to whether such training should be independent or integrated with postgraduate training for psychiatric or sports medicine. Conclusion: The results provide insight into sports psychiatry and its areas of activity and should be used for, and integrated with, the further development of the field.

Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) experience a range of medical and neurodevelopmental conditions, necessitating systematic study of their occurrence and impact on neurodevelopmental outcomes. We describe the prevalence and relationships of medical, neurodevelopmental (ND), and mental health (MH) conditions in children with DS. We created a prospective clinical database of individuals with DS, integrated into the workflow of a specialty Down Syndrome Program at a specialty pediatric referral hospital. Conditions were collected through caregiver- and clinician report at clinical visits (N = 599). We calculated frequencies of medical, ND, and MH conditions and then assessed the relationship between medical, ND, and MH conditions using frequencies and comparative statistics. The most frequent co-occurring conditions were vision (72.5%), ear/hearing (71.0%), gastrointestinal (61.3%), respiratory (45.6%), and feeding (33.6%) problems, with variation in frequency by age. ND and MH conditions were reported in one quarter, most commonly autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Those with ND and MH conditions had greater frequency of medical conditions, with highest rates of vision, ear/hearing, and gastrointestinal issues, and CHD. Systematically collected clinical data in a large cohort of children with DS reveals high prevalence of several co-occurring medical, ND, and MH conditions. Clinical care requires an understanding of the complex relationship between medical conditions and neurodevelopment.

Copy number variation is now recognized as an important class of risk factor for several child psychiatric disorders. In this article, we first explain what copy number variants (CNVs) are. We then consider key findings and what these have told us about the etiology of these conditions. Finally, we discuss whether these findings can yet translate into clinical practice.

Joseph Biederman, MD (1947-2023)

Objective-This retrospective cohort study examined the association between co-occurring serious mental illness and substance use disorders and parole revocation among inmates from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the nation's largest state prison system. Methods-The study population included all 8,149 inmates who were released under parole supervision between September 1, 2006, and November 31, 2006.An electronic database was used to identify inmates whose parole was revoked within 12 months of their release.The independent risk of parole revocation attributable to psychiatric disorders, substance use disorders, and other covariates was assessed with logistic regression analysis.Results-Parolees with a dual diagnosis of a major psychiatric disorder (major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorder) and a substance use disorder had a substantially increased risk of having their parole revoked because of either a technical violation (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=1.7,95% confidence interval [CI]=1.4-2.4) or commission of a new criminal offense (OR=2.8,95% CI=1.7-4.5) in the 12 months after their release.However, parolees with a diagnosis of either a major psychiatric disorder alone or a substance use disorder alone demonstrated no such increased risk.Conclusions-These findings highlight the need for future investigations of specific social, behavioral, and other factors that underlie higher rates of parole revocation among individuals with co-occurring serious mental illness and substance use disorders.Over the past four decades the widespread deinstitutionalization of persons with serious mental illness (1-3), the increase in drug-related arrests (4,5), and the reduction of community-based mental health care (1,2) have resulted in a substantial overrepresentation of persons with serious mental illness in the U.S. correctional system (1,2,6).Approximately 10% to 20% of U.S. prison inmates are estimated to have an axis I major mental disorder of thought or mood, such as major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia (7-12).Moreover, a majority of inmates with serious mental illness have a comorbid substance use disorder (7,(12)(13)(14)(15).A number of investigations have examined predictors of recidivism among released inmates (16)(17)(18)(19).Although results of these studies-conducted throughout a variety of criminal justice

Paediatricians and child psychiatrists share complex cases, often associated with abuse, neglect and other ‘Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs)’. ACEs are associated in a dose-response relationship with both mental and physical...

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Book ReviewsFull AccessCommunity-Based Interventions for Criminal Offenders With Severe Mental IllnessDaniel W. Phillips III, Ph.D.Daniel W. Phillips IIISearch for more papers by this author, Ph.D.Published Online:1 Jul 2004https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.55.7.841AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail This work focuses on offenders with mental illness and the limitations in diverting them from the criminal justice system. The inaccurate belief that deinstitutionalization directly caused the "criminalization" of mental health consumers has led many to become overly optimistic about diversion programs. In other words, they erroneously believe that a lack of mental health resources is the main reason people with mental illnesses are in the criminal justice system and that we need simply divert them into mental health treatment to correct the situation.Unfortunately, according to the authors represented in Community-Based Interventions for Criminal Offenders With Severe Mental Illness, diversion is not that simple, and there are many limitations to the complex issue. The multidisciplinary authors of this work write to a broad audience—the fields of psychiatry, psychology, public health, social work, and sociology. Novice and expert readers alike will find valuable information here. The authors provide readers with current research on the intersection of offenders with mental illness, community mental health treatment, and the criminal justice system. Specific topics include case management, jail diversion, new-generation antipsychotics, forensic psychiatry, mental health courts, and institutions such as prisons and hospitals.The book specifies many specific limitations to diversion. Some offenders with mental illness are not jailed specifically because of their mental illness. There is no relationship between "levels and availability" of community-based supports and the chances of a consumer's becoming involved with the criminal justice system. Women who take new-generation antipsychotic medication are more likely to be involved with the criminal justice system than women who do not. Jail diversion programs have limited proof of success. Mental health courts are effective only under certain conditions and will most likely not be successful with all offenders who have mental illness.The book is well written by accomplished authors who have published extensively in the area of criminal justice and mental illness. Although the book deals with theoretical issues, the authors also provide information to those who work in practical settings. The book has several strengths. First, it explains the history of the intersection of mental illness and criminal justice. Some chapters begin with a history of mental illness and criminal justice that includes deinstitutionalization in the 20th century and Dorothea Dix's crusade to free jailed mental health consumers in the 19th century. Second, the book examines previous theories about offenders with mental illness, tests them, and provides the reader with information on what works, what does not, what needs to be examined further, and new ways of conceptualizing the issue. Readers are even provided with a new taxonomy of offenders with mental illness. Finally, the book provides information that will be useful to policy makers in making decisions about programs.The book has few faults. Its main "fault" is that although it provides a wealth of information from the mental health services research side of the issue, it would be even better if it included more from criminal justice researchers. That would only help to better explore the complex issue of offenders with mental illness.Dr. Phillips is assistant professor and program coordinator of the criminal justice program at Lindsey Wilson College in Columbia, Kentucky. He also serves as a program evaluator for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.edited by William H. Fisher, Ph.D.; Oxford, England, Elsevier, Ltd., 2003, 220 pages, $86 FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited ByNone Volume 55Issue 7 July 2004Pages 841-841 Metrics PDF download History Published online 1 July 2004 Published in print 1 July 2004

As in life generally, so in scholarly publishing, the turn of the year inevitably encourages editors to reflect soberly and take honest stock of the progress their journals have made over the previous 12months. In this frame of mind, my own thoughts turned to our beloved Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Of course I say ours because we who currently work at the journal, know it actually belongs to you, the world-wide community of child and adolescent psychologists and psychiatrists: We are only its stewards. We hold it in trust for the whole field. We understand the important role that it has served, in shaping the field of scientific child psychology and psychiatry. We know it has a special place in both your intellectual and working lives. We are aware how important it is to you that the journal continues, on your behalf, to help drive the promotion of science-driven and evidence-based solutions to the great, and, in some aspects, growing, burden of suffering imposed by childhood mental and neuro-developmental disorders. It is vital that we have your confidence that we do this in a transparent and fair way - without fear or favour - not letting our own preconceptions, prejudices or vested interests influence the content of what we publish - unless it is our prejudice towards, and vested interest in, finding out 'the truth of the matter'. We are acutely aware of the responsibility that all this places on our shoulders - a yoke we feel privileged to bear.