Abstract

In this editorial the editors anounce a new partnership between the ISS and the Centre of Criminology at the University of Cape Town, to co-edit and publish future issues of SACQ. The editorial also reviews recent developments in politics, law and accountability in South Africa.

Highlights

  • In February, the Constitutional Court found that Zuma had failed to uphold and respect the Constitution by ignoring the public protector’s 2014 finding that he unduly benefitted from tax-funded upgrades to his private residence

  • We are very pleased to announce that the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) has partnered with the University of Cape Town (UCT) as co-custodians of the South African Crime Quarterly (SACQ)

  • Despite the court’s finding, at the time of writing the South African public was no closer to knowing whether the president would capitulate to the court’s injunction and ‘pay back the money’

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In February, the Constitutional Court found that Zuma had failed to uphold and respect the Constitution by ignoring the public protector’s 2014 finding that he unduly benefitted from tax-funded upgrades to his private residence. We are very pleased to announce that the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) has partnered with the University of Cape Town (UCT) as co-custodians of the South African Crime Quarterly (SACQ).

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.