Economic viability of tech-check-tech in an independent community pharmacy

Abstract

ObjectivesTo determine the economic feasibility of implementing community pharmacy–based tech-check-tech compared with other common community pharmacy practice models. MethodsA decision tree analysis compared 4 community pharmacy practice models: (1) historical (pharmacist or technician fills prescriptions and pharmacist gives immunizations); (2) historical with tech-check-tech (technician or certified technician fills prescriptions and pharmacist gives vaccinations); (3) modern (historical model plus medication therapy management [MTM] services); and (4) modern with tech-check-tech (modern model but a technician or certified technician handles all fills). A series of summed Markov models with a 1-year time horizon compared strategies on gross profit with the use of cycles of 1 hour of work attributed to either filling prescriptions, giving vaccinations, or conducting MTM. ResultsBased on current MTM volume, the splitting of pharmacist time across all services (modern model) was the most profitable strategy, resulting in approximately $1700 more than the next most profitable approach (historical model). Models incorporating tech-check-tech need significant time to be filled by MTM services, vaccinations, or other billable services to make up for the investment made into pharmacists’ time. For these models, the likelihood of conducting a comprehensive medication review (CMR) in a given hour needs to exceed 47% for allocating all pharmacist time to nonfilling functions to be more profitable. Performing targeted medication reviews alone (without the chance of a CMR) was not sufficient to make tech-check-tech a profitable strategy. At the current inputs, billable services of exceeding approximately $18 and $20 per hour are needed for tech-check-tech to be the most profitable model with and without MTM services, respectively. ConclusionTech-check-tech implementation in the community setting has the potential to be profitable if pharmacist time is adequately scheduled with other billable services. Future research in this area should increase the number of pharmacies included and expand analyses to encompass chain-based community pharmacies.