Abstract

The structure of decision-making in the field of trade policy in Finland after World War I is analysed in this study, with the theory of public choice and the institutional theory of Douglass C. North as the premises. Dependent on her foreign trade, Finland was quickly forced by economic considerations to build up a trade policy of her own. One way to normalise the situation was to create corporative structures in which the private sector wielded direct influence. Typical of the Finnish system was the key role played by certain, relatively few, people especially in negotiations on trade agreements. This is interpreted as resulting from the administrative underdevelopment of Finland in the early years of independence, the country's small size, and the scarcity of persons classifiable as an economic élite. The political heritage of the 1918 civil war is also seen as a strong explanatory variable.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.