Abstract

There is a lack of published research on the economic effect and the risk associated with sand and dust storms (SDS) worldwide. The objectives of this study are to estimate the economic impact of SDS on the oil and gas industry in Kuwait, to estimate a risk index for each loss, and to recommend a sustainable system for the mitigation of the damaging effects and economic losses of infrastructures. Hot spots of wind erosion, wind corridors, and dust frequency and severity formed the basis to locate the most susceptible oil and gas fields and operations. Ten sectors with potential loss vulnerabilities were evaluated: exploration, drilling, production, gas, marine, soil remediation, project management, water handling, maintenance, and research and development. Sand encroachment, although not a sector per se, was also considered. The results indicate that sand, and to lesser extent dust, are damaging and costly to the oil and gas infrastructure of Kuwait, with an economic cost estimation of US$9.36 million, a total of 5159 nonproductive lost hours, and 347,310 m3 of annual sand removal. A risk assessment identified three sectors with the highest risk indices (RI): drilling (RI = 25), project management (RI = 20), and maintenance (RI = 16). Sand encroachment also constituted a high risk (RI = 25). Mitigation of sand storms using a hybrid biological–mechanical system was shown to be cost-effective with an equivalent saving of 4.6 years of sand encroachment. The hazard implications of sand storm events continue to be a major concern for policy-makers given their detrimental economic impacts, and require that government officials wisely allocate investment budgets to effectively control and mitigate their damaging effects.

Highlights

  • The results indicate that the highest risk indices identified from sand and dust storms (SDS) events are determined by the following three sectors: drilling operations (RI = 25), project management (RI = 20), and maintenance and support (RI = 16); sand encroachment, not a sector per se, constituted a high risk (RI = 25), while the lowest risk index is represented by the research and development sector (RI = 6)

  • This study provides a comprehensive and integrated approach to the assessment of SDS events: an economic impact analysis, a risk assessment, and mitigation techniques

  • The qualitative risk assessment process presented in this study provides an effective and practical tool for identifying system vulnerabilities associated with natural hazards

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sand and dust storms (SDSs) are the result of wind erosion by either natural or anthropogenic factors. There is no strict distinction between the definitions of sand versus dust storms [2]. Sand-size particles are larger than about 0.06 mm, and, in desert dust, most sandy particles will stay within several meters of the ground surface. The transport trajectories of sand storms are commonly entrained within the local source, while for dust storms the transport is transboundary; that is, from local and distant (regional/global) sources. Other studies have defined dust events when particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter below 10 μm (PM10) is above 200 μg/m3 [4,5] or above 150 μg/m3 [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.