Abstract

Based on the operating data of a 40 tCO2/day (2 megawatt (MW)) class carbon capture and utilization (CCU) pilot plant, the scaled-up 400 tCO2/day (20 MW) class CCU plant at 500 MW power plant was economically analyzed by applying the levelized cost of energy analysis (LCOE) and CO2 avoided cost. This study shows that the LCOE and CO2 avoided cost for 400 tCO2/day class CCU plant of mineral carbonation technology were 26 USD/MWh and 64 USD/tCO2, representing low LCOE and CO2 avoided cost, compared to other carbon capture and storage CCS and CCU plants. Based on the results of this study, the LCOE and CO2 avoided cost may become lower by the economy of scale, even if the CO2 treatment capacity of the CCU plant could be extended as much as for similar businesses. Therefore, the CCU technology by mineral carbonation has an economic advantage in energy penalty, power plant construction, and operating cost over other CCS and CCU with other technology.

Highlights

  • Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the atmosphere from anthropogenic activities continue to grow worldwide [1,2,3], as CO2 emissions in the period 2010 to 2014 grew about 31.9 to 35.5 GtCO2 per year, an average rate of 2.75% per year [4], escalating global warming

  • Based on the operating data and input cost of a 40 tCO2/day (2 megawatt (MW)) class carbon capture and utilization (CCU) pilot plant at a coal-fired power plant, the scaled-up 400 tCO2/day (20 MW) class CCU plant at 500 MW coal-fired power plant was economically analyzed by applying the levelized cost of energy analysis (LCOE) and CO2 avoided cost, considering the energy penalty

  • The additional capex for installing the 400 tCO2/day class CCU plant at the 500 MW coal-fired power plant is based on the 2018 price level, which was applied for the preliminary design of the 400 tCO2/day class CCU plant

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the atmosphere from anthropogenic activities continue to grow worldwide [1,2,3], as CO2 emissions in the period 2010 to 2014 grew about 31.9 to 35.5 GtCO2 per year, an average rate of 2.75% per year [4], escalating global warming. IEA has published a research report, “cost and performance of carbon dioxide capture from power generation, IEA, 2011,” comparing the economic feasibility of CCS-applied technologies (post-combustion, pre-combustion, oxy-combustion) between the levelized cost of energy analysis (LCOE) and CO2 avoided cost [24]. Based on the operating data and input cost of a 40 tCO2/day (2 megawatt (MW)) class CCU pilot plant at a coal-fired power plant, the scaled-up 400 tCO2/day (20 MW) class CCU plant at 500 MW coal-fired power plant was economically analyzed by applying the LCOE and CO2 avoided cost, considering the energy penalty. We have calculated the LCOE and CO2 avoided cost for mineral carbonation, resulting in 26 USD/MWh and 64 USD/tCO2 each, and conducted comparative studies with other CCS and CCU technologies, which were higher cost for each factor.

Applied Technoollooggyy
Applied Scale and Process
Economic Evaluation Method and Cost Calculation of the CCU Plant
Calculation of the CO2 Avoided Cost
Comparative Analysis with Other Studies
Findings
Sensitivity Analysis

Full Text

Published Version
Open DOI Link

Get access to 115M+ research papers

Discover from 40M+ Open access, 2M+ Pre-prints, 9.5M Topics and 32K+ Journals.

Sign Up Now! It's FREE