Abstract

Ecosystem services can be defined as the ecosystem’s contribution to human activities. According to recent assessments, the agricultural sector is one of the most important economic users of ecosystem services in Europe. To assess, value, and account for ecosystem services related to the agri-food system offers the possibility to measure and investigate how agricultural management practices together with changing environmental conditions can affect ecological resilience. However, the accounting of ecosystem services’ flows needs to be carefully addressed, because the overlapping of services and benefits and the overlapping of what are considered intermediate and final services could create dangerous misunderstandings about the role and importance of ecosystem services in agriculture. This paper reports on the possible accounting approaches that can be used to assess crop provision, as well as their meanings and implications from an ecological to an economic perspective. The results demonstrate that an economic accounting-based assessment of ecosystem services needs to move from an ecological holistic view to a one-by-one disaggregation of ecosystem services in order to avoid underestimates that would ultimately affect the policy perception of the role of ecosystems with respect to the agri-food systems’ resilience.

Highlights

  • Intermediate and Economically Final: Abstract: Ecosystem services can be defined as the ecosystem’s contribution to human activities

  • Ecosystem services (ESs) can be defined as the ecosystem’s contribution to human activities, i.e., a range of services that nature provides to the socioeconomic system, in the form of material and immaterial flows

  • Theory to of Concrete energy enables the estimation of the percentage of the yield that is directly attributable The quantitative assessments presented are based on KIP INCA applito the ecosystem contribution, according to the following equation: cations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intermediate and Economically Final: Abstract: Ecosystem services can be defined as the ecosystem’s contribution to human activities. The results demonstrate that an economic accounting-based assessment of ecosystem services needs to move from an ecological holistic view to a one-by-one disaggregation of ecosystem services in order to avoid underestimates that would affect the policy perception of the role of ecosystems with respect to the agri-food systems’ resilience. From a first general perspective that considers all ESs, agricultural landscapes [1], agricultural systems [2], or cropland as an ecosystem type [3] can provide a variety of ESs, such as crop provision, water purification, carbon sequestration, flood control, and nature-based recreation. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.