Abstract

This article examines technological dynamics from the perspective of an ecological criticism of growth. The first part introduces the use of pragmatist thinking for this purpose. It also provides a basic definition of criticism of technological growth, which is a criticism of a self-increasing and uncontrollable dynamics of means that fails to take social and ecological ends into account. The second section explicates pragmatist thinking in more detail and argues for reflecting on means–ends relationships as a critical guideline in assessing technological developments. The third section builds on this conception and discusses historical and current criticism-of-growth debates, particularly degrowth/postgrowth debates. The main results of these considerations are, first, that specifications of growth can clarify the role of technology in growth dynamics, and, second, further reflections on societal development are necessary to overcome the uncontrollable proliferation of technologies. With regard to the first point, the fourth section distinguishes between direct and indirect driving forces underlying the dynamics of technological advancement: technological development is inherently driven while consumerism and capitalist accumulation can indirectly reinforce technological dynamics as well. Finally, section five points to the potential of pragmatist ideas to obtain more control over the criticized dynamics in a democratic and sustainable way.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.