East to West collaboration for a gender equality in STEM

Promoting Leadership by Women in Gastroenterology—Lessons Learned and Future Directions

We need to make sure telecommuting does not exacerbate gender disparity

How to Promote Career Advancement and Gender Equity for Women in Gastroenterology: A Multifaceted Approach

Despite ongoing efforts towards gender equity, the gender gap in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) remains significant today. This article explores the motivations and perceptions of women in different professional roles within STEM fields regarding the importance of mentoring in fostering interest and participation in STEM careers, thus contributing to continuing engineering education. Based on qualitative data from 19 semi-structured interviews with women in managerial, research, teaching, and external academic and professional roles, the study delves into their motivations for pursuing STEM careers, their interest in promoting diversity, and the role of mentoring in supporting their professional development. The thematic analysis results are grouped into a hierarchical structure comprising one meta-theme, four primary, and six subthemes. The participants emphasized that their primary motivation for STEM involvement was contributing to society and promoting economic growth. Additionally, they advocated for greater diversity and challenged traditional gender roles in these areas. The participants highlighted the importance of closing the gender gap and recognizing the capabilities and new perspectives that women brought. Although these women faced obstacles such as glass ceilings, having a mentorship opportunity was identified as a critical tool for women’s empowerment and training. The insights contribute to advancing strategies for promoting gender equity and diversity in STEM fields, with implications for researchers, universities, and organizations seeking to support women’s participation and advancement in STEM careers. Further research is recommended to explore the perspectives of women in other roles and the effectiveness of mentoring programs in fostering gender diversity in STEM.

Don't Hold Your Breath—The Rise of Women on Journal Editorial Boards

Debate has continued throughout the last decade over the existence and possible causes of differences between males' and females' mathematical skills. Several observations recur as the focus of this controversy. First, adolescent boys have been found to score higher than girls on standardized mathematics achievement tests.' Second, males are more likely than females to engage in a variety of optional activities related to mathematics, from technical hobbies to careers in which math skills play an important role.2 Third, adolescent males typically perform better than their female

This longitudinal evaluation of gender inequalities and economic growth addresses key questions in the evolving debate over the character of gender differentiation and the goals of womens empowerment. These questions include: 1) whether the impact of strategies of economic growth served to enhance or undermine the status of women; 2) whether changes in the status of women were accompanied by significant changes in gender inequality; and 3) the implications for existing debates. Section I reviews several sets of literature pertinent to the questions using three general approaches: modernization-neoclassical women in development and gender and development. Section II presents the data and methods used in the evaluation. The research assessed the contending interpretations reviewed in the first section by combining another set of cross-sectional and longitudinal data on womens status and inequalities between men and women with other existing indicators. Section III discusses the results in the following order: 1) cross-sectional patterns in womens status; 2) trends in womens status; 3) cross-sectional patterns in inequality between men and women; 4) trends in inequality between men and women; and 5) conclusion. Finally section IV presents an overall discussion of the findings of the whole longitudinal evaluation.

PurposeThe paper innovates on the existing literature by assessing the gender gap in Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM) tertiary education enrolment and career choice in a small country setting and by extending on Master and Meltzoff (2016) theoretical framework to provide a holistic explanation of the gender disparity through a mix of personal, environmental and behavioural factors. The study first probes into the existence of potential gender disparity in STEM tertiary enrolment in Mauritius. Second, in contrast with existing studies where selective factors are used to measure the gender gap in STEM education, this paper investigates into a combination of personal, environmental and behavioural factors that may influence participation in STEM education and career.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses a survey of 209 undergraduates enroled in the main public university and investigates into the existence of a gender gap in STEM tertiary education enrolment and the reasons behind this disparity. Consistent with the theoretical model, the empirical analysis also investigates into the work environment (which cannot be measured from the survey), via semi-structured interviews of 15 women in STEM professions.FindingsThe logit regression results first reveal the existence of a gender disparity in the choice of STEM-related degrees. The probability of a female student to enrol in a STEM degree is lower than that of a male student, after controlling for all the personal, environmental and behavioural factors. The most important set of reasons influencing the student's STEM degree choice are self-efficacy and the student's academic performance in STEM subjects at secondary school level. The findings also demonstrate that young women are relatively more likely to choose STEM degrees than their male counterparts when they are supported by their family, school and teachers. There is further evidence of lower participation of women in STEM professions as well as significant challenges which women in STEM careers face compared to their male colleagues.Originality/valueThis study adopts a holistic framework to assess the factors that hinder women's participation in STEM tertiary education and career in Mauritius.

Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries

Internationally, the need to advance science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education is recognized as being vital for meeting social and economic challenges and developing a scientifically, mathematically, and technologically literate citizenry. In many countries, however, there are gender differences in the participation and achievement of girls and women in STEM education and STEM careers, usually to the disadvantage of females. This paper aims to identify challenges to female students’ participation in STEM both at post-primary (secondary school) level and beyond in the Irish context. The research questions we aim to address in this paper are: (1) what are student attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics as measured through interest and perceived ability in STEM, students’ valuing of STEM and students’ commitment to STEM? and (2) what gender differences occur regarding students’ attitudes to science, technology, engineering and mathematics? A survey was completed by 308 post-primary students in Ireland as part of a one-year research project titled “STEMChAT: Women as catalysts for change in STEM education.” Data analysis compiled descriptive statistics, including response frequencies and percentages and median and interquartile range values, and compared gender differences in survey responses using the Kruskal–Wallis H Test. Results indicated that female students had significantly more positive attitudes to science compared to males while in comparison, males had significantly more positive responses to mathematics compared to females. Challenges regarding access to and understanding of STEM in the context of post-primary education are discussed.

III. Next on the agenda: gender

There is a need to take into account environmental factors such as national culture and policy when seeking to progress women’s workforce participation and advancement in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). This chapter describes why this environmental scaffolding must be accompanied by micro-level organizational initiatives that focus on systematically embedding gender equality. It details the accelerating potential of formal micro-level organizational interventions, outlining their value and efficacy in removing multi-layered gender inequalities and in mainstreaming gender equality best practice through workplace cultures. One such initiative, Athena SWAN, supports the systematic embedding of gender equality best practice in third-level educational institutions and supersedes previous episodic initiatives undertaken in pockets around universities and led by individuals. Drawing on the perspective of the University of Limerick, the chapter details the benefits and contribution of Athena SWAN to supporting women’s career progression, presenting relevant data from STEM, as well as outlining its associated challenges.

According to the Global Gender Gap Report 2020, most of the countries have achieved gender parity in educational attainment. Furthermore, Latin America and Europe have more women than men enrolled in tertiary education. The problem arises when those numbers are analysed by degree studies. There is a gender gap in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), with a low number of women enrolled in those programs and even lower numbers of graduates. The universities have a key role to steer new conceptions and understanding of the females in STEM. The higher education institutions have to define measures and policies to reduce the gender gap in the careers of the future. This work aims to provide a proposal to analyse the gender equality gap in STEM as a first step to define gender equality action plans focused on processes of attraction, access and retention and guidance in STEM programs. The proposal was applied in ten Latin American universities from Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador and Mexico, and five European universities from Finland, Ireland, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom.

A considerable body of research exists on women in leadership and likewise, on women in STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) fields. However, the intersection of the two is terra incognita: women in leadership in STEM. At the most fundamental level, we do not even have a solid idea of how many women hold leadership positions in STEM. This study determined the proportion of women in leadership positions in several academic STEM areas via a sampling of institutions across the United States. In every area studied, women held fewer leadership positions than the proportion of female PhDs in those fields. The proportion of women in non-STEM specific top academic leadership roles was also examined to see what proportion of those individuals leading academic institutions might have background in a STEM discipline and how that compares to men in the same positions.

The glass ceiling represents the invisible barriers preventing women from reaching top leadership positions. In the Sri Lanka Administrative Service (SLAS) there is a stark gender disparity at higher executive levels. Although women increasingly fill entry-level positions, their representation sharply declines in senior roles. This study examines factors affecting glass ceiling in the Sri Lanka Administrative Service. By employing in-depth interviews with 15 female top executive officers, data was collected and Deductive Thematic Analysis was used to analysis the data. This study identified six main barriers women face namely, political, personal, organizational, psychological, social-cultural and stereotyped barriers. These obstacles hinder women’s career advancement despite their qualifications and experience. The research offers policy measures for organizations, individuals, and society to better support the development of women in leadership. The significance of this study lies in its comprehensive exploration of the multifaceted barriers women encounter within the Sri Lanka Administrative Service (SLAS), highlighting the urgent need for systemic change in a historically male-dominated sector. By focusing on the experiences of female top executive officers, the research provides nuanced insights into how these barriers intersect and create a complex web that stifles women's career progression. This study emphasizes the importance of understanding these barriers not just in isolation but also as part of a broader societal context, thereby enriching the discourse on gender equality in leadership. Keywords: Career Advancement, Glass Ceiling, Sri Lanka Administrative Service