Abstract

BackgroundBone tunnel enlargement following primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with soft tissue graft might be a severe disadvantage for revision surgery. The postoperative rehabilitation protocol including the non-weight-bearing periods were different depending on the surgeon or institute. To determine the relationship between femoral bone tunnel enlargement and the postoperative non-weight-bearing period after double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts.MethodsForty-two patients who underwent primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts were divided into two postoperative non-weight-bearing protocol groups: 1-week non-weight-bearing postoperatively (group A, n = 19); and 2-week non-weight-bearing (group B, n = 18). Five cases were excluded due to additional knee injury, pregnancy, and lost to follow-up.Bone tunnel enlargement was evaluated by computed digital radiographs (anteroposterior (A-P) and lateral views) taken on the first postoperative day and at 12 months. Each tunnel diameter was shown as a percentage to the maximum joint width of the proximal tibia in the A-P view, or a percentage of the maximum diameter of the patella in the lateral view. To determine the incidence of tunnel enlargement, percentage diameter changes of more than 10% were defined as an enlarged tunnel. The magnitude of tunnel enlargement and the standard clinical evaluation were also evaluated.ResultsThere were no significant differences between groups in the incidences of anteromedial and posterolateral bone tunnel enlargement, both in the A-P and lateral views (2 × 2 Chi-squared test). The magnitude of femoral posterolateral bone tunnel enlargement was significantly greater in group A in the A-P view (p = 0.01) and lateral view (p = 0.03) (Mann Whitney U-test). Twelve months after surgery, the Lysholm score and Tegner activity level scale were not significantly different between the groups.ConclusionsThis prospective, clinical and radiographical study showed that early weight-bearing protocol after double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts might have the potential risk of significant postoperative femoral bone tunnel enlargement of the posterolateral bundle. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes by postoperative non-weight-bearing period. To reduce and prevent the femoral bone tunnel enlargement, the comprehensive management could be considered and required to establish the suitable early stage rehabilitation protocol after surgery.Trial registrationTrial registration number; UMIN000036212.Scientific title: Prospective comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement with two different postoperative non weight bearing periods after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring grafts.Registered date: 15 Mar 2019 (retrospectively registered).

Highlights

  • Bone tunnel enlargement following primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with soft tissue graft might be a severe disadvantage for revision surgery

  • Tajima et al BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2019) 20:274 (Continued from previous page). This prospective, clinical and radiographical study showed that early weight-bearing protocol after double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts might have the potential risk of significant postoperative femoral bone tunnel enlargement of the posterolateral bundle

  • There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes by postoperative non-weight-bearing period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bone tunnel enlargement following primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with soft tissue graft might be a severe disadvantage for revision surgery. To determine the relationship between femoral bone tunnel enlargement and the postoperative non-weight-bearing period after double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts. ACL reconstruction has become one of the commonly performed procedures for ACL-deficient athletes. Many surgical procedures for ACL reconstruction and good clinical outcomes have been reported [5,6,7]. Rotational laxity due to significant translation of the lateral compartment in single-bundle compared with double-bundle ACL reconstruction has been reported [8,9,10]. The anatomically ACL-reconstructed knee showed satisfactory restoration of rotator laxity, as measured by an electromagnetic measurement system, independent of the surgical procedure [11]. Failure and recurrent instability rate of ACL reconstruction have been reported between 10 and 15%, leading to a large number of revision ACL reconstruction [12, 13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.