Early vasodilator response to anodal current application in human is not impaired by cyclooxygenase-2 blockade

Abstract

It is generally acknowledged that cutaneous vasodilatation in response to monopolar galvanic current application would result from an axon reflex in primary afferent fibers and the neurogenic inflammation resulting from neuropeptide release. Previous studies suggested participation of prostaglandin (PG) in anodal current-induced cutaneous vasodilatation. Thus the inducible cyclooxygenase (COX) isoform (COX-2), assumed to play a key role in inflammation, should be involved in the synthesis of the PG that is released. Skin blood flow (SkBF) variations induced by 5 min of 0.1-mA monopolar anodal current application were evaluated with laser-Doppler flowmetry on the forearm of healthy volunteers treated with indomethacin (COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitor), celecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor), or placebo. SkBF was indexed as cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC), expressed as percentage of heat-induced maximal CVC (%MVC). Urinalyses were performed to test celecoxib treatment efficiency. No difference was found in CVC values at rest: 14.3 +/- 4.0, 11.9 +/- 3.2, and 10.9 +/- 2.0% MVC after indomethacin, celecoxib, and placebo treatment, respectively. At 10 min after the onset of anodal current application, CVC values were 22.2 +/- 4.9% MVC (not significantly different from rest) with indomethacin, 85.7 +/- 15.3% MVC (P < 0.001 vs. rest) with celecoxib, and 70.4 +/- 13.1% MVC (P < 0.001 vs. rest) with placebo. Celecoxib significantly depressed the urinary prostacyclin metabolite 6-keto-PGF(1alpha) (P < 0.05 vs. placebo). Indomethacin, but not celecoxib, significantly inhibited the anodal current-induced vasodilatation. Thus, although they are assumed to result from an axon reflex in primary afferent fibers and neurogenic inflammation, these results suggest that the early anodal current-induced vasodilatation is mainly dependent on COX-1-induced PG synthesis.