Early Rehabilitation After Stroke: a Narrative Review.

In the last decade, increasing attention has been paid to understanding the components of care that might contribute to the stroke unit effect. Early mobilization, in its many guises, is one component of care proposed to contribute to the survival and recovery benefits of stroke unit care.1 This topical review provides an overview of the current evidence, research, and practice recommendations for early mobilization after stroke. As a term, early mobilization is problematic. There is no common understanding of the meaning of early (eg, hours, days, weeks, months) or mobilization (movement of, eg, cells, joints, limbs, people). A recurring theme in this review, inadequate definition currently limits our ability to synthesize information on the topic. For example, in some clinical trials of mobility interventions started soon after stroke, mobilization is used to describe a program of task-specific standing and walking retraining (rehabilitation) delivered by therapists or nurses and continued throughout the acute hospital stay.2,3 In other cases, mobilization refers simply to moving a patients’ limbs in bed or sitting them out of bed. The timing of commencement of activity is also highly variable and often hard to determine. As both what we do (intervention type, intensity, frequency, amount), and when we do it, may confer benefit or harm, we highlight variations in definition where relevant. We have focused our review on out-of-bed interventions commencing in the first 24 to 72 hours after stroke, as this is the period of greatest clinical uncertainty. Early mobilization was first discussed at a Swedish consensus conference on stroke care in the mid-1980s (Bo Norving and Bent Indredavik, personal communication, 2014) with several local guidelines in Norway and Sweden recommending the practice. Early mobilization became more prominent in the literature in the early 1990s when Indredavik and colleagues reported their clinical …

Home based therapy can be of, at least, short term value

Stroke is among the leading causes of death and disability globally, leaving the patients with post-stroke hemiparesis approximately in 60% of stroke survivors. Upper limb (UL) impairment, in particular fine motor function, poses significant challenges in daily living activities. Although Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Mirror Therapy (MT) have been employed to address these issues, limited research compares the effectiveness of each therapy. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of CIMT and MT in improving dexterity and motor function in post-stroke hemiparetic c patients, contributing to the existing knowledge of targeted rehabilitation strategies. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with 120 post-stroke hemiparetic patients recruited from a hospital in Southern Italy between January 2022 and July 2024. Participants were divided into three groups (CIMT, MT, and a control group receiving only conventional therapy) and underwent treatment for 40 days. Outcome measures included manual dexterity (Nine Hole Peg Test), hand strength (Hand Grip Strength Test), and functional independence (Barthel Index, Quick DASH, and Modified Rankin Scale). Statistically significant improvements were observed in both the CIMT and MT groups compared to controls, with notable gains in dexterity, motor function, and independence in ADLs. No statistically significant differences emerged between CIMT and MT in overall efficacy, though CIMT demonstrated a slightly greater impact on motor strength. Both CIMT and MT are effective and safe adjuncts to conventional rehabilitation, enhancing UL recovery in post-stroke patients. This study is the first RCT to directly compare CIMT and MT, offering insights into optimized rehabilitation strategies. Future studies should examine long-term impacts and explore home-based application feasibility.

A randomized trial of novel upper limb rehabilitation in children with congenital hemiplegia

Early rehabilitation and mobilisation encompass patient-tailored interventions, delivered within intensive care, but there are few studies in children and young people within paediatric intensive care units. To explore how healthcare professionals currently practise early rehabilitation and mobilisation using qualitative and quantitative approaches; co-design the Paediatric Early Rehabilitation and Mobilisation during InTensive care manual of early rehabilitation and mobilisation interventions, with primary and secondary patient-centred outcomes; explore feasibility and acceptability of implementing the Paediatric Early Rehabilitation and Mobilisation during InTensive care manual within three paediatric intensive care units. Mixed-methods feasibility with five interlinked studies (scoping review, survey, observational study, codesign workshops, feasibility study) in three phases. United Kingdom paediatric intensive care units. Children and young people aged 0-16 years remaining within paediatric intensive care on day 3, their parents/guardians and healthcare professionals. In Phase 3, unit-wide implementation of manualised early rehabilitation and mobilisation. Phase 1 observational study: prevalence of any early rehabilitation and mobilisation on day 3. Phase 3 feasibility study: acceptability of early rehabilitation and mobilisation intervention; adverse events; acceptability of study design; acceptability of outcome measures. Searched Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, PEDro, Open grey and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Narrative synthesis. In the scoping review we identified 36 full-text reports evaluating rehabilitation initiated within 7 days of paediatric intensive care unit admission, outlining non-mobility and mobility early rehabilitation and mobilisation interventions from 24 to 72 hours and delivered twice daily. With the survey, 124/191 (65%) responded from 26/29 (90%) United Kingdom paediatric intensive care units; the majority considered early rehabilitation and mobilisation a priority. The observational study followed 169 patients from 15 units; prevalence of any early rehabilitation and mobilisation on day 3 was 95.3%. We then developed a manualised early rehabilitation and mobilisation intervention informed by current evidence, experience and theory. All three sites implemented the Paediatric Early Rehabilitation and Mobilisation during InTensive care manual successfully, recruited to target (30 patients recruited) and followed up the patients until day 30 or discharge; 21/30 parents consented to complete additional outcome measures. The findings represent the views of National Health Service staff but may not be generalisable. We were unable to conduct workshops and interviews with children, young people and parents to support the Paediatric Early Rehabilitation and Mobilisation during InTensive care manual development due to pandemic restrictions. A randomised controlled trial is recommended to assess the effectiveness of the manualised early rehabilitation and mobilisation intervention. A definitive cluster randomised trial of early rehabilitation and mobilisation in paediatric intensive care requires selection of outcome measure and health economic evaluation. The study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019151050. The Phase 1 observational study is registered Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04110938 (Phase 1) (registered 1 October 2019) and the Phase 3 feasibility study is registered NCT04909762 (Phase 3) (registered 2 June 2021). This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 17/21/06) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 27. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Postoperative pneumonia and delayed physical recovery are significant problems after emergency laparotomy. No randomized controlled trial has assessed the feasibility, safety, or effectiveness of intensive postoperative physical therapy in this high-risk acute population. The internal pilot phase of the Incidence of Complications after Emergency Abdominal Surgery: Get Exercising (ICEAGE) trial was a prospective, randomized controlled trial that evaluated the feasibility, safety, and clinical trial processes of providing intensive physical therapy immediately following emergency laparotomy. Fifty consecutive patients were recruited at the principal participating hospital and randomly assigned to standard-care or intensive physical therapy of twice daily coached breathing exercises for 2 days and 30 minutes of daily supervised rehabilitation over the first 5 postoperative days. Interventions were provided exactly as per protocol in 35% (78 of 221 patients) of planned treatment sessions. Main barriers to protocol delivery were physical therapist unavailability on weekends (59 of 221 patients [27%]), awaiting patient consent (18 of 99 patients [18%]), and patient fatigue (26 of 221 patients [12%]). Despite inhibitors to treatment delivery, the intervention group still received twice as many breathing exercise sessions and four times the amount of physical therapy over the first 5 postoperative days (23 minutes [interquartile range, 12-29 minutes] vs. 86 minutes [interquartile range, 53-121 minutes]; p < 0.001). One adverse event was reported from 78 rehabilitation sessions (1.3%), which resolved fully on cessation of activity without escalation of medical care. Intensive postoperative physical therapy can be delivered safely and successfully to patients in the first week after emergency laparotomy. The ICEAGE trial protocol resulted in intervention group participants receiving more coached breathing exercises and spending significantly more time physically active over the first 5 days after surgery compared with standard care. It was therefore recommended to progress into the multicenter phase of ICEAGE to definitively test the effect of intensive physical therapy to prevent pneumonia and improve physical recovery after emergency laparotomy. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II.

Background: Cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) are a leading cause of disability worldwide, significantly impairing hand function and impacting quality of life. Rehabilitation strategies like Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Mirror Therapy (MT) have shown potential for improving motor function in stroke patients.Objective: To compare the effectiveness of CIMT and MT in improving hand function in patients with infarcted CVA.Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 26 participants (13 in each group) recruited from rehabilitation centers. Group A received CIMT, involving 45-minute sessions, five days a week for four weeks, focusing on repetitive task training with the affected limb while restricting the unaffected limb. Group B underwent MT with similar session frequency, utilizing visual feedback through a mirror. Hand function was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI). Data were analyzed using Mixed Model ANOVA on SPSS version 25.Results: At post-assessment, the CIMT group showed significant improvement in FMA upper-arm (mean 29.46±1.45, p=0.011) and CAHAI scores (mean 71.77±3.88, p=0.020) compared to the MT group.Conclusion: Both CIMT and MT were effective for hand function improvement in infarcted CVA patients, with CIMT demonstrating more significant results.

Considerable variability exists in how children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy respond to intensive upper extremity therapies. Individual and environmental factors interact to shape responsiveness.

Response

Background. Limited data are available about the effectiveness of early rehabilitation after stroke. Objective. This is the 1st randomized controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) in subacute stroke to investigate neurophysiologic mechanisms and long-term outcome. Methods. Within 2 weeks after stroke, 23 patients with upper extremity (UE) weakness were randomized to 2 weeks of CIMT or traditional therapy at an equal frequency of up to 3 h/day. Motor function of the affected UE was blindly assessed before treatment, after treatment, and 3 months after stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measured the cortical area evoking movement of the affected hand. Results. Long-term improvement in motor function of the affected UE did not differ significantly between patients who received CIMT versus intensive traditional therapy. All outcome comparisons showed trends favoring CIMT over intensive traditional therapy, but none was statistically significant except for improvements in the Fugl-Meyer (FM) UE motor scale immediately following treatment and in reported quality of hand function at 3 months. Improvement in UE motor function on the FM was associated with a greater number of sites on the affected cerebral hemisphere where responses of the affected hand were evoked by TMS. Conclusions. Future trials of CIMT during early stroke rehabilitation need greater statistical power, more inclusive eligibility criteria, and improved experimental control over treatment intensity. The relationship between changes in motor function and in evoked motor responses suggests that motor recovery during the 1st 3 months after stroke is associated with increased motor excitability of the affected cerebral hemisphere.

Unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) is a condition that affects muscle control and function on one side of the body. Children with unilateral CP experience difficulties using their hands together secondary to disturbances that occur in the developing fetal or infant brain. Often, the more affected limb is disregarded. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) aims to increase use of the more affected upper limb and improve bimanual performance. CIMT is based on two principles: restraining the use of the less affected limb (for example, using a splint, mitt or sling) and intensive therapeutic practice of the more affected limb.To evaluate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) in the treatment of the more affected upper limb in children with unilateral CP.In March 2018 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro, OTseeker, five other databases and three trials registers. We also ran citation searches, checked reference lists, contacted experts, handsearched key journals and searched using Google Scholar.Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCTs or clinically controlled trials implemented with children with unilateral CP, aged between 0 and 19 years, where CIMT was compared with a different form of CIMT, or a low dose, high-dose or dose-matched alternative form of upper-limb intervention such as bimanual intervention. Primarily, outcomes were bimanual performance, unimanual capacity and manual ability. Secondary outcomes included measures of self-care, body function, participation and quality of life.Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts to eliminate ineligible studies. Five review authors were paired to extract data and assess risk of bias in each included study. GRADE assessments were undertaken by two review authors.We included 36 trials (1264 participants), published between 2004 and 2018. Sample sizes ranged from 11 to 105 (mean 35). Mean age was 5.96 years (standard deviation (SD) 1.82), range three months to 19.8 years; 53% male and 47% participants had left hemiplegia. Fifty-seven outcome measures were used across studies. Average length of CIMT programs was four weeks (range one to 10 weeks). Frequency of sessions ranged from twice weekly to seven days per week. Duration of intervention sessions ranged from 0.5 to eight hours per day. The mean total number of hours of CIMT provided was 137 hours (range 20 to 504 hours). The most common constraint devices were a mitt/glove or a sling (11 studies each).We judged the risk of bias as moderate to high across the studies.Primary outcomes at primary endpoint (immediately after intervention)CIMT versus low-dose comparison (e.g. occupational therapy)We found low-quality evidence that CIMT was more effective than a low-dose comparison for improving bimanual performance (mean difference (MD) 5.44 Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) units, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.37 to 8.51).CIMT was more effective than a low-dose comparison for improving unimanual capacity (Quality of upper extremity skills test (QUEST) - Dissociated movement MD 5.95, 95% CI 2.02 to 9.87; Grasps; MD 7.57, 95% CI 2.10 to 13.05; Weight bearing MD 5.92, 95% CI 2.21 to 9.6; Protective extension MD 12.54, 95% CI 8.60 to 16.47). Three studies reported adverse events, including frustration, constraint refusal and reversible skin irritations from casting.CIMT versus high-dose comparison (e.g. individualised occupational therapy, bimanual therapy)When compared with a high-dose comparison, CIMT was not more effective for improving bimanual performance (MD -0.39 AHA Units, 95% CI -3.14 to 2.36). There was no evidence that CIMT was more effective than a high-dose comparison for improving unimanual capacity in a single study using QUEST (Dissociated movement MD 0.49, 95% CI -10.71 to 11.69; Grasp MD -0.20, 95% CI -11.84 to 11.44). Two studies reported that some children experienced frustration participating in CIMT.CIMT versus dose-matched comparison (e.g. Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy, bimanual therapy, occupational therapy)There was no evidence of differences in bimanual performance between groups receiving CIMT or a dose-matched comparison (MD 0.80 AHA units, 95% CI -0.78 to 2.38).There was no evidence that CIMT was more effective than a dose-matched comparison for improving unimanual capacity (Box and Blocks Test MD 1.11, 95% CI -0.06 to 2.28; Melbourne Assessment MD 1.48, 95% CI -0.49 to 3.44; QUEST Dissociated movement MD 6.51, 95% CI -0.74 to 13.76; Grasp, MD 6.63, 95% CI -2.38 to 15.65; Weightbearing MD -2.31, 95% CI -8.02 to 3.40) except for the Protective extension domain (MD 6.86, 95% CI 0.14 to 13.58).There was no evidence of differences in manual ability between groups receiving CIMT or a dose-matched comparison (ABILHAND-Kids MD 0.74, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.18). From 15 studies, two children did not tolerate CIMT and three experienced difficulty.The quality of evidence for all conclusions was low to very low. For children with unilateral CP, there was some evidence that CIMT resulted in improved bimanual performance and unimanual capacity when compared to a low-dose comparison, but not when compared to a high-dose or dose-matched comparison. Based on the evidence available, CIMT appears to be safe for children with CP.

Many poststroke patients suffer functional motor limitation of the affected upper limb, which is associated with diminished health-related quality of life. The aim of this study is to conduct a randomized, multicenter, comparative study of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with intensive occupational therapy, NEURO (NovEl intervention Using Repetitive TMS and intensive Occupational therapy) versus constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis. In this randomized controlled study of NEURO and constraint-induced movement therapy, 66 poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis were randomly assigned at 2:1 ratio to low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus occupational therapy (NEURO group) or constraint-induced movement therapy (constraint-induced movement therapy group) for 15 days. Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Wolf Motor Function Test and Functional Ability Score of Wolf Motor Function Test were used for assessment. No differences in patients' characteristics were found between the two groups at baseline. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment score was significantly higher in both groups after the 15-day treatment compared with the baseline. Changes in Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores and Functional Ability Score of Wolf Motor Function Test were significantly higher in the NEURO group than in the constraint-induced movement therapy group, whereas the decrease in the Wolf Motor Function Test log performance time was comparable between the two groups (changes in Fugl-Meyer Assessment score, NEURO: 5·39 ± 4·28, constraint-induced movement therapy: 3·09 ± 4·50 points; mean ± standard error of the mean; P < 0·05) (changes in Functional Ability Score of Wolf Motor Function Test, NEURO: 3·98 ± 2·99, constraint-induced movement therapy: 2·09 ± 2·96 points; P < 0·05). The results of the 15-day rehabilitative protocol showed the superiority of NEURO relative to constraint-induced movement therapy; NEURO improved the motion of the whole upper limb and resulted in functional improvement in activities of daily living.

Constraint Induced Movement Therapy as a Rehabilitative Strategy for Ischemic Stroke—Linking Neural Plasticity with Restoration of Skilled Movements

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by pronounced motor dysfunction and resulting in physical disability. Neural precursor cells (NPCs) have shown therapeutic promise in mouse models of hypoxic-ischemic (HI) perinatal brain injury, which mirror hemiplegic CP. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) enhances the functional use of the impaired limb and has emerged as a beneficial intervention for hemiplegic CP. However, the precise mechanisms and optimal application of CIMT remain poorly understood. The potential synergy between a regenerative approach using NPCs and a rehabilitation strategy using CIMT has not been explored. We employed the Rice-Vannucci HI model on C57Bl/6 mice at postnatal day (PND) 7, effectively replicating the clinical and neuroanatomical characteristics of hemiplegic CP. NPCs were transplanted in the corpus callosum (CC) at PND21, which is the age corresponding to a 2-year-old child from a developmental perspective and until which CP is often not formally diagnosed, followed or not by Botulinum toxin injections in the unaffected forelimb muscles at PND23, 26, 29 and 32 to apply CIMT. Both interventions led to enhanced CC myelination and significant functional recovery (as shown by rearing and gait analysis testing), through the recruitment of endogenous oligodendrocytes. The combinatorial treatment indicated a synergistic effect, as shown by newly recruited oligodendrocytes and functional recovery. This work demonstrates the mechanistic effects of CIMT and NPC transplantation and advocates for their combined therapeutic potential in addressing hemiplegic CP.

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. A common, chronic deficit after stroke is upper limb impairment, which can be exacerbated by compensatory use of the nonparetic limb. Resulting in learned nonuse of the paretic limb, compensatory reliance on the nonparetic limb can be discouraged with constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). CIMT is a rehabilitative strategy that may promote functional recovery of the paretic limb in both acute and chronic stroke patients through intensive practice of the paretic limb combined with binding, or otherwise preventing activation of, the nonparetic limb during daily living exercises. The neural mechanisms that support CIMT have been described in the lesioned hemisphere, but there is a less thorough understanding of the contralesional changes that support improved functional outcome following CIMT. Using both human and non-human animal studies, the current review explores the role of the contralesional hemisphere in functional recovery of stroke as it relates to CIMT. Current findings point to a need for a better understanding of the functional significance of contralesional changes, which may be determined by lesion size, location, and severity as well stroke chronicity.