Abstract
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent valvular pathology in the USA affecting 1.7% of the population [1]. The two predominant forms of MR in the Western World are mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) [2]. The optimal surgical strategy is still debated in both entities. Previous data comparing mitral valve repair (MVr) and replacement (MVR) approaches are based on a heterogeneous population in terms of LV function and baseline characteristics. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all the relevant studies and to compare the mortality between the 2 surgical treatment strategies in patients with MVP and IMR. Using PubMed database, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library we performed literature searches and thereafter individually reviewed relevant articles, extracted relevant data and entered in Review Manager software ([RevMan] version 5.1.20 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark)).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
