Abstract

Real World Evidence (RWE) and its uses are playing a growing role in medical research and inference. Prominently, the 21st Century Cures Act—approved in 2016 by the US Congress—permits the introduction of RWE for the purpose of risk-benefit assessments of medical interventions. However, appraising the quality of RWE and determining its inferential strength are, more often than not, thorny problems, because evidence production methodologies may suffer from multiple imperfections. The problem arises to aggregate multiple appraised imperfections and perform inference with RWE. In this article, we thus develop an evidence appraisal aggregation algorithm called EA3. Our algorithm employs the softmax function—a generalisation of the logistic function to multiple dimensions—which is popular in several fields: statistics, mathematical physics and artificial intelligence. We prove that EA3 has a number of desirable properties for appraising RWE and we show how the aggregated evidence appraisals computed by EA3 can support causal inferences based on RWE within a Bayesian decision making framework. We also discuss features and limitations of our approach and how to overcome some shortcomings. We conclude with a look ahead at the use of RWE.

Highlights

  • Real World Evidence (RWE) [1] is one of the new frontiers of medical research and inference and attracts growing interests in academic and industrial research

  • RWE comprises observational data obtained outside the context of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) which are produced during routine clinical practice

  • According to a broader understanding, it may be possible to point at any source of information, that is related to medications and not directly retrievable from RCTs, as a potential generator of RWE, e.g. social networks [2]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Real World Evidence (RWE) [1] is one of the new frontiers of medical research and inference and attracts growing interests in academic and industrial research. RWE comprises observational data obtained outside the context of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) which are produced during routine clinical practice. According to a broader understanding, it may be possible to point at any source of information, that is related to medications and not directly retrievable from RCTs, as a potential generator of RWE, e.g. social networks [2].

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.