Abstract

Black holes in Lorentz-violating theories have been claimed to violate the second law of thermodynamics by perpetual motion energy extraction. We revisit this question for a Penrose splitting process in a spherically symmetric setting with two species of particles that move on radial geodesics that extend to infinity. We show that energy extraction by this process cannot happen in any theory in which gravity is attractive, in the sense of a geometric inequality that we describe. This inequality is satisfied by all known Einstein-\ae{}ther and Ho\v{r}ava black hole solutions.

Highlights

  • The defining property of a black hole is that nothing can escape from its interior which, in general relativity, is separated from the exterior by a null hypersurface called the event horizon

  • Black holes in Lorentz-violating theories have been claimed to violate the second law of thermodynamics by perpetual motion energy extraction

  • We revisit this question for a Penrose splitting process in a spherically symmetric setting with two species of particles that move on radial geodesics that extend to infinity

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The defining property of a black hole is that nothing can escape from its interior which, in general relativity, is separated from the exterior by a null hypersurface called the event horizon. Each excitation could keep a linear dispersion relation but with differing propagation speeds In this case different massless excitations propagate along the null cones of distinct effective metrics. This second scenario should still capture some aspects of the low-momentum behaviour present in the first scenario. Our results do not directly contest the perpetuum mobile constructions of [17,18] They do indicate that removing the external agents from the construction and considering dynamics introduces a significant new obstruction. We view this result as a strong and qualitatively new argument against violation of the generalized second law in Lorentz-violating gravitational theories.

SCENARIO FOR PERPETUAL MOTION
ENERGY EXTRACTION VERSUS THERMODYNAMICS
PERPETUAL MOTION EXCLUSION CRITERION
PERPETUAL MOTION ADMISSION CRITERION
DISCUSSION
Notation
Geometric preliminaries
Conservation laws
Contradiction
Comments
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.