Abstract
AbstractThe largest earthquakes of the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, sequence were a M6.4 left‐lateral rupture followed 34 hr later by a M7.1 on a perpendicular right‐lateral fault. We use dynamic rupture modeling to address the questions of why the first earthquake did not propagate through the right‐lateral fault in one larger event, whether stress changes from the M6.4 were necessary for the M7.1 to occur, and how the Ridgecrest earthquakes affected the nearby Garlock Fault. We find that dynamic clamping and shear stress reduction confined surface rupture in the M6.4 to the left‐lateral fault. We also find that stress changes from the M6.4 were not necessary to allow a M7.1 on the right‐lateral fault but that they affected the slip and likely accelerated the timing of the M7.1. Lastly, we find that the Ridgecrest earthquakes may have brought the central Garlock Fault closer to failure.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
