Dynamic gradient-echo and fat-suppressed spin-echo contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast

Abstract

To evaluate heavily T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast in comparison with conventional imaging and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Fifty patients with surgically/pathologically proven breast disease were examined pre-operatively by MRI. The majority, 45 patients, had invasive carcinoma. T1-weighted spin-echo, T2-weighted fast spin-echo (with chemical-shift-selective fat-suppression in 20 cases), rapid dynamic contrast-enhanced gradient-echo and post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted images were obtained. Signal intensity changes during dynamic scanning were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. Comparison was made with the results of X-ray mammography, ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology. Unenhanced MRI was inadequate for determining the location, extent or nature of most lesions even when fat-suppressed T2-weighted images were obtained. Following contrast injection, there was significantly greater enhancement of invasive carcinomas than normal parenchyma. Invasive carcinomas of ductal and lobular subtypes did not differ significantly in their enhancement profiles. Prominent enhancement of the lesion periphery, which was a feature in 33 out of 50 cases (the majority of which were invasive carcinomas) was not due to central tumour necrosis. In four cases, invasive carcinomas which were clearly visible on early dynamic scans could not be identified on post-contrast fat-suppressed images. Lesions that were more numerous or extensive than had been recognised clinically or mammographically were revealed by MRI in 14 patients, though MRI was no more specific than conventional assessment. Invasion of the chest wall was accurately predicted by MRI in three cases. There was excellent correlation between tumour size shown by MRI and histopathology. FNAC was accurate in predicting the final histological diagnosis except in those cases where samples were unsatisfactory. Contrast-enhanced MRI appears useful in the assessment of suspected malignant breast masses, especially in younger women with predominantly glandular breast tissue. Specificity is no better than FNAC but tumour extent and multifocality are more accurately disclosed than by conventional imaging techniques. Contrast-enhanced chemical-shift-selective fat-suppressed images are sub-optimal in a small proportion of cases (particularly where lesions are located posteriorly) and some benign breast disease may appear misleadingly conspicuous on such images. Morphological features and quantification of lesion enhancement during dynamic scanning presently offer only limited prospects for discrimination between various pathologies. Heavily T2-weighted sequences appear of marginal value.