Abstract
Cocaine is extracted from coca: a native bush from the Amazon rainforest. Coca is mostly grown in remote areas to avoid government intervention, and it has been increasingly cultivated inside protected areas (PAs). The effects of coca cultivation on the preservation of PAs are largely unknown. This research uses panel data (2006–2008) from a total of 684 farmers to evaluate the influence of coca growing on the acceptance of PAs, using as case study a farmer community located within the buffer zone of Bahuaja-Sonene National Park (Peru). All farmers are coffee growers and some complement their income with coca production. The area has not been subject of forced coca eradication activities. The data were analyzed using probit models with covariance matrix correction for cluster errors by year, with and without interaction effects. The results suggest that coca growers are more likely to state a positive opinion about the PA than non-coca growers. This may reflect the fact that non-coca growers need extensive areas of land for coffee cultivation in order to approach the economic benefits obtained by farmers who also grow coca. However the likelihood of stating a positive opinion by coca growers decreases the higher the perception that coca cultivation has increased in the region. Coca growers may be afraid that large coca areas would lead to the implementation of forced eradication activities. In such a case, the BSNP would restrict the access to remote land resources, which in turn decreases the support for this PA.
Highlights
The tropical Andes is the hotspot of the greatest biodiversity on the planet [1]
The results suggest that coca growers are more likely to state a positive opinion about the protected areas (PAs) than non-coca growers
The Bahuaja-Sonene National Park (BSNP) would restrict the access to remote land resources, which in turn decreases the support for this PA
Summary
The humid forests of the tropical Andes region support the richest flora and fauna collections in the world with remarkable numbers of endemic and rare species. This high degree of endemism is a result of the numerous mountain uplifts which have fragmented habitats and allowed species to evolve with separate identities [2]. Conservation of tropical forests should be a top priority [3]; large areas of the tropical Andes are being severely degraded [4]. Part of this damage can be attributed to the continuous movement of farmers into the tropical Andes for the purpose of cultivating crops [2]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.