Abstract

Recurrent conflicts between farmers and pastoralists have brought significant impacts on both groups. In response to this situation, the government and other actors have taken several measures to mitigate such conflicts with little success. This paper examined drivers and consequences of recurrent conflicts between farmers and pastoralists in Kilosa and Mvomero districts. Covering a sample size of 203 respondents, data was collected using interview, documentary review, and focus group discussions. Collected data was analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The findings revealed that weak governance structures associated with unethical behavior, regulatory deficiencies, socio-economic and environmental factors are responsible for the recurrence of conflicts between farmers and pastoralists. Consequently, the recurrent conflicts have resulted into major socio-economic impact that includes loss of lives and properties to both farmers and pastoralists. Drawing from conflict and conflict resolution theories, which advocates use of coercive power and participatory approaches to restore peace, respectively; this paper conclude that no single strategy fits all conflicts given the complexity in which such conflicts occurs. In the light of the results this paper recommends that the effective way to address farmers-pastoralists conflicts; actors should use both lenses of coercive and participatory approaches and the choice of appropriate strategy will depends on the context since no single approach fits all types of conflicts...

Highlights

  • The term conflict refers to misunderstanding, disagreement, or divergence of ideas, which result into hurting each other, and when management is delayed, it can lead into coercive measures that suggest forceful victory on either party (Norman, 2013:41)

  • With the understanding of this situation, this paper attempts to answer the following questions; why do farmers-pastoralists conflicts recur in Kilosa and Mvomero districts? What are the new drivers of farmers-pastoralists conflicts in Kilosa and Mvemoro districts? What could be the best measures to address such conflicts in Kilosa and Mvomero districts? What are the consequences of recurrence of farmers-pastoralists conflicts in Kilosa and Mvomero districts?

  • This paper considers among factors accounting for recurrence conflicts between farmers and pastoralists to include socio-economic factors, unethical practices, environmental factors and regulatory framework which originated from respondents, key informants (KIs) and focus group discussion (FGDs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The term conflict refers to misunderstanding, disagreement, or divergence of ideas, which result into hurting each other, and when management is delayed, it can lead into coercive measures that suggest forceful victory on either party (Norman, 2013:41). Conflicts are generally relational disputes between two or more parties, for example farmers and Pastoralist. Conflicts between farmers and pastoralists are not new phenomena. Conflicts have been reported in Holy books; for instance, in the Bible, we are told about Cain, a farmer who killed Abel who was a pastoralist (Genesis 4: 2-8; NIV, 1984). Different scholars have reported the tension between farmers and pastoralists in different parts of the world including Africa. Despite conflicts becoming a common phenomenon and several efforts made to avert the situation, conflicts are reported to recur

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.