Abstract

Cities, regions and countries are increasingly adapting to climate change. Adaptation approaches often build on disaster management activities to deal with climate extremes and make improvements to already existing systems to prepare for climate change, e.g., through water engineering or cooling existing buildings. But ideally, adaptation strategies aim also at tackling the root causes of climate risks through broader sustainable development pathways. Such transformational approaches, however, are still in their infancy. In this perspective paper we argue that there is a lack of guidance to support policy-makers to develop transformational adaptation strategies. There is a need and opportunity to develop climate services that support transformational adaptation. We explore how climate services can support transformational adaptation, drawing from literature, practical experience and illustrative examples. We identify four knowledge requirements: (1) system knowledge to identify the root causes and solutions; (2) inspirational and cross-disciplinary knowledge to develop a long-term vision; (3) a clear climate message and guiding principles to mainstream the vision; and (4) design principles that are connected to the priorities and interests of the stakeholders. We conclude that developing climate services for transformational adaptation involves a delicate process of simplifying and aggregating climate knowledge, as well as integrating it with knowledge about the physical, economic and social systems of cities and regions. This means that climate service providers need to widen their scope and skills, and collaborate with experts in the fields urban planning, landscape architecture, ecology, health, and sociology.

Highlights

  • Policy-makers need access to climate information to effectively plan for climate change adaptation (e.g., Fussel et al, 2006)

  • We explore how climate services can support transformational adaptation in practice

  • To illustrate how climate services can support transformational adaptation, we present examples from three local Dutch authorities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Policy-makers need access to climate information to effectively plan for climate change adaptation (e.g., Fussel et al, 2006). In policy domains where risk management is the dominant approach (e.g., in environmental, natural hazard, or water management), the range of adaptation solutions that are considered, may be largely informed by a frame that is oriented toward preventing the negative consequences of climate change, rather promoting positive outcomes (de Boer et al, 2010). The policy-makers recognized the three approaches in their practice and described a mix of reactive, incremental and transformational adaptation efforts in their areas.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.