Abstract

To determine the strength of the evidence in the literature that screening proctosigmoidoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality. All English-language studies reporting mortality or survival from screening proctosigmoidoscopy published since 1960 were critically reviewed. Fifteen references reported on five studies of screening proctosigmoidoscopy. Two authors independently reviewed each reference using explicit methodologic criteria, particularly for potential sources of bias. Of the five studies, four used historical controls and were susceptible to bias, especially self-selection and lead-time bias. Only the Kaiser-Permanente Multiphasic Health Check-up study collected a representative patient sample from a defined population, had randomly allocated controls, and avoided multiple sources of bias. There was a reduction in mortality from a group of seven potentially postponable causes of mortality, including colorectal cancer, although no difference in overall mortality between screened and control groups was found. This study was not designed to determine specifically the impact of screening proctosigmoidoscopy on mortality from colorectal cancer, and suggested that most of the reduction in colorectal cancer deaths was due to a lower incidence in the screened group, which could not be attributed to polypectomy. The benefit of screening proctosigmoidoscopy in this study, if any, was small. The evidence in the literature is inadequate to determine whether or not screening proctosigmoidoscopy has an impact on colorectal cancer mortality, but the best available data suggest that the benefit is small, at best.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.