Abstract

The process of species description is not random, and understanding the factors that influence when a species is first described (the date of first description, DoFD) allows us to target environments and/or species' traits to increase our knowledge of diversity. Such studies typically correlate species traits (e.g. maximum size, occupational depth) against DoFD, forgetting that species are not statistically independent of each other, owing to the inheritance of shared characteristics. A recent study of extant fishes by Costello et al. (2015) identified depth and geographic range size as the most important (of many) predictors of the DoFD, implying that newly described species will likely occupy restricted areas and occur deep in the water column. However, these authors failed to accommodate for “identity by descent” in their analyses. We correct that oversight here, and conclude that while the adjustments strengthen the associations between the different predictors and the DoFD, the overall affects are minimal and they do not materially change Costello et al.’s (2015) conclusions. This is briefly discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.